Christian Critical Realism for Action Research

Introduction
Part I: A Biblical Foundation for Critical Realist Knowing
Part II: An Overview of Critical Realism as a Philosophy of Science
Part III: The Scholar-Practitioner’s Vocation: Action Research through a Critical Realist Lens
Conclusion
1. Works cited

Introduction

The Christian scholar-practitioner is called to a unique vocation: to be an agent of healing and transformation in a broken world. This calling demands more than practical skill or benevolent intention; it requires a coherent philosophical and theological foundation that can sustain rigorous inquiry and guide effective action. The central challenge, then, is one of epistemology. What research paradigm allows a Christian to engage the world’s complex problems—poverty, injustice, systemic oppression—with intellectual honesty, theological integrity, and practical efficacy?

For decades, social science has been caught in a philosophical impasse between two dominant paradigms: positivism and social constructionism.1 Positivism, with its emphasis on empirical observation and measurable data, offers a sense of objectivity but often operates with a “flat ontology” that ignores the deeper, spiritual, and structural realities that generate the very phenomena it seeks to measure.2 It can describe the symptoms of social ills but often fails to explain their root causes. At the other extreme, strong forms of social constructionism rightly highlight the role of language, culture, and power in shaping our understanding of the world. Yet, in their most radical forms, they can lead to a relativism that undermines the Christian commitment to objective truth, the reality of a divinely created order, and the authority of God’s revealed will.5 For the scholar-practitioner whose work is animated by the conviction that injustice is a real violation of God’s created order, neither paradigm is fully adequate.

This paper argues that Critical Realism (CR), particularly when understood through the lens of a biblical worldview, offers the most promising philosophical framework for the Christian scholar-practitioner. A Christian approach to Critical Realism provides a robust epistemology that affirms the existence of an objective, God-created reality while fully acknowledging the fallible, socially-situated, and sin-affected nature of human knowledge. This epistemology, in turn, provides the ideal theoretical grounding for action research, transforming it from a mere technique into a disciplined, reflective, and redemptive practice. By wedding the theological depth of the Christian narrative with the philosophical rigor of Critical Realism and the practical methodology of action research, the scholar-practitioner is equipped to not only study the world but to participate faithfully in its restoration.

Part I: A Biblical Foundation for Critical Realist Knowing

A coherent Christian worldview does not merely find an ally in Critical Realism; it provides the very theological grammar from which a critical realist epistemology naturally emerges. The grand biblical narrative—structured by the doctrines of Creation, Fall, Redemption, and Restoration—offers a powerful and internally consistent framework for understanding how we can know a real world, even with our limited and fallen minds. This narrative structure provides a theological alternative to the dead-end debate between a naïve realism that ignores the Fall and an anti-realist postmodernism that ignores Creation and Revelation.

The Created Order and the Intransitive Real

The starting point for a Christian theory of knowledge is the doctrine of Creation. Scripture presents the cosmos not as a projection of the human mind or a social construct, but as an objective, structured reality that exists independently of human consciousness.7 This theological assertion corresponds directly to the core tenet of Critical Realism: ontological realism, the belief in a reality that exists whether we are aware of it or not.3 The philosopher of science Roy Bhaskar termed this mind-independent reality the intransitive dimension.10

The biblical basis for this is foundational. The creation accounts in Genesis 1-2 depict God speaking an ordered and intelligible world into existence. This world is declared “good” and possesses an inherent structure apart from human perception. The Psalmist declares that “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork” (Psalm 19:1, ESV), indicating that creation has an objective character that reveals its Creator. The Apostle Paul, in Colossians 1:16-17, affirms that all things—visible and invisible—were created through Christ and are held together in him. This establishes a universe with an objective structure, sustained by divine power, not human thought.7

This theological affirmation provides a firm rejection of both philosophical idealism (which locates reality in the mind) and strong social constructionism (which sees all reality as a product of human discourse).12 For the Christian scholar-practitioner, this is profoundly liberating. It provides the confidence that there is a real world “out there” to be investigated, a world with inherent meaning and structure grounded in the character of its Creator.13 The social problems we confront, such as poverty or racism, are not merely linguistic constructs; they are real disorders within God’s good but groaning creation.

The Fall and the Transitive Nature of Knowledge

While Creation establishes an objective reality, the doctrine of the Fall explains why our knowledge of that reality is so often flawed, partial, and contested. The Fall introduced sin into the world, and its consequences are not merely moral but also cognitive, what theologians call the “noetic effects of sin.” This theological concept aligns powerfully with CR’s principle of epistemic relativism—the acknowledgment that our knowledge of reality is always fallible, theory-laden, and socially situated.3 Bhaskar called this fallible, human-dependent body of knowledge the transitive dimension.10

Scripture provides a stark diagnosis of our epistemic condition. Paul argues in Romans 1:18-21 that fallen humanity actively “suppress[es] the truth in unrighteousness,” leading to futile thinking and darkened hearts. The prophet Jeremiah declares that “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” (Jeremiah 17:9, ESV).16 Paul further notes that “the god of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers” (2 Corinthians 4:4, ESV), preventing them from seeing the truth clearly. Our knowledge is therefore not a pure reflection of reality but is profoundly mediated by our fallen worldviews, cultural assumptions, and sinful desires.17

This biblical understanding of human fallibility provides a theological explanation for the gap between the intransitive real (God’s created order) and our transitive understanding of it. It grounds CR’s critique of what Bhaskar termed the “epistemic fallacy”—the common error in both positivism and idealism of reducing what is real (an ontological question) to what we can know with certainty (an epistemological question).10 A Christian worldview refutes the positivist’s naïve confidence in direct, unmediated access to “raw data” by pointing to the distorting lens of the Fall.18 We can know truly, but we never know exhaustively or infallibly.

Revelation as the Bridge to Reality

If our perception is fallen, how can we know anything truly? The Christian faith answers: through divine self-disclosure, or revelation. This theological concept provides the foundation for CR’s third tenet: judgmental rationality. This is the belief that, despite our fallibility, it is possible to adjudicate between rival truth claims and make genuine progress toward a truer, more adequate understanding of reality.3

Christian theology distinguishes between two modes of revelation. General revelation refers to God’s disclosure of Himself through the created order and the human conscience (Romans 1-2), which is accessible to all but is suppressed and distorted by sin.17

Special revelation, found in the inspired words of Scripture and supremely in the person of Jesus Christ (Hebrews 1:1-2), serves as an authoritative interpretive lens. It does not bypass our reason but enlightens and corrects it, providing the necessary framework to make proper sense of the world and our experience within it.20

The work of New Testament scholar N. T. Wright serves as a powerful example of a theological critical realism in practice. Wright approaches the biblical texts with the conviction that they refer to real historical events (ontological realism). However, he simultaneously insists that our understanding of these texts is always partial and shaped by our own worldviews (epistemic relativism). Therefore, gaining a more accurate understanding requires a “spiralling path of appropriate dialogue” between the modern reader and the ancient text, a process of critical reflection that challenges the assumptions of both.18 This hermeneutical method models the judgmental rationality that CR champions, moving beyond both the naïve literalism of fundamentalism and the destructive skepticism of radical criticism to a position of humble, critical faith.14

Redemption and the Emancipatory Vocation

Finally, the Christian mission to participate in God’s redemptive work provides the ultimate purpose and motivation for the “critical” and emancipatory impulse within Critical Realism. The goal of Christian scholarship is not merely descriptive but transformative. Paul’s exhortation to “be transformed by the renewal of your mind” (Romans 12:2, ESV) and to “take every thought captive to obey Christ” (2 Corinthians 10:5, ESV) frames research as a spiritual discipline.24 It is an active participation in overcoming the noetic effects of the Fall through the power of the Holy Spirit.

This redemptive mandate aligns directly with CR’s emancipatory potential.11 The “critical” in Critical Realism is not just about being critical of flawed theories; it is about critiquing the oppressive social structures, ideologies, and power dynamics that cause human suffering and obscure the truth.26 For the Christian scholar-practitioner, research is an act of love and justice. Its purpose is to uncover the truth about the deep causes of brokenness in order to set people free and contribute to the flourishing of all creation, thereby bearing witness to the coming Kingdom of God.

Part II: An Overview of Critical Realism as a Philosophy of Science

To effectively apply Critical Realism, scholar-practitioners must first grasp its philosophical architecture. Developed primarily by the British philosopher Roy Bhaskar, CR emerged as a “third way” philosophy of science, seeking to transcend the sterile impasse between positivism and the various forms of interpretivism and postmodernism that deny the possibility of causal explanation.1 It offers a sophisticated, post-positivist account of science that reintroduces a robust ontology—a theory of being—as the necessary foundation for all inquiry.3

Origins: Roy Bhaskar’s Critique of Scientific Practice

Bhaskar’s project, beginning with his landmark 1975 book A Realist Theory of Science, was to develop a philosophy that could make sense of what scientists actually do.10 He employed a “transcendental argument,” which asks: what must the world be like for a given practice, such as scientific experimentation, to be intelligible?.29

Bhaskar observed that experimental science is defined by the scientist’s active intervention to create a “closed system” (e.g., a laboratory) in which specific variables can be isolated and controlled. This is necessary precisely because, in the “open system” of the real world, countless forces interact simultaneously, making clear causal patterns difficult to observe.11 The dominant positivist philosophy, which defined a causal law as a “constant conjunction of events” (i.e., whenever X happens, Y always follows), could not account for this. If causal laws were simply empirical regularities, experiments would be unnecessary; one could simply observe the world. Yet, the knowledge gained in the lab is considered valid for understanding the world outside the lab, where such constant conjunctions rarely, if ever, occur.3

This led Bhaskar to his central critique of the “epistemic fallacy”—the pervasive error in Western philosophy of reducing questions of being (ontology) to questions of knowledge (epistemology).10 Positivism commits this fallacy by implicitly defining reality as that which is observable and measurable. CR insists on separating these domains: there is a real world that exists independently of our knowledge of it (ontology), and our knowledge of that world is a fallible, socially produced endeavor (epistemology).10

The Architecture of Reality: Empirical, Actual, and Real

The cornerstone of CR’s restored ontology is its concept of a stratified reality. Bhaskar argued that reality consists of three nested domains, a concept best visualized as an iceberg where only the smallest fraction is visible above the water’s surface.34

The Empirical: This is the domain of experience and observation—what we can see, feel, or measure. It is the visible tip of the iceberg and represents only a small subset of what actually happens.33
The Actual: This is the domain of events and occurrences. It includes everything that happens, whether it is observed by humans or not. The empirical is a subset of the actual.25
The Real: This is the deepest and most fundamental domain. It consists of the underlying structures, interconnected relationships and systems, powers, and generative mechanisms that possess the causal potential to produce the events that occur in the actual domain. The actual is a subset of the real.25

This stratified model is a powerful analytical tool for the scholar-practitioner. It pushes research beyond mere description of empirical experiences to seek explanation at the deeper levels of reality. The following table illustrates the application of this framework.

Table 1: The Domains of Reality in Critical Realism

Domain	Definition	Natural Science Example	Social Science Example (Poverty) 37
The Empirical	The realm of human experience and observation; what we can see, feel, or measure.	Observing an apple fall from a tree.	Witnessing homelessness, food bank usage, and unemployment statistics.
The Actual	The realm of all events and occurrences, whether they are experienced by humans or not.	An apple falling from a tree in an unpopulated forest.	The specific event of a person losing their job, even if not directly observed by a researcher.
The Real	The deep, underlying structures, powers, and causal mechanisms that have the potential to generate events.	The generative mechanism of gravity (a property of mass-energy).	The generative mechanisms of systemic economic inequality, discriminatory housing policies, lack of access to quality education, and racial discrimination.

Causality Re-examined: Uncovering Generative Mechanisms

By stratifying reality, CR offers a far more sophisticated account of causality than the positivist model of constant conjunction, which is derived from the empiricist philosophy of David Hume.3 CR locates causality not at the level of events (the actual) but at the level of mechanisms (the real).3

Generative mechanisms are the real causal powers, liabilities, and tendencies of things, which are rooted in their intrinsic structures.39 For example, the structure of the H2O molecule gives water the causal power to dissolve salt. In the complex open systems of the social world, these mechanisms may exist but go unactivated, or their effects may be counteracted by other mechanisms.3 This explains why social science cannot produce universal, predictive laws like physics; social structures are in a much greater state of flux and are constantly being reproduced or transformed by human agency.3

The goal of critical realist research, therefore, is not to find correlations but to identify the mechanisms that generate the phenomena under investigation. The primary mode of inference used to achieve this is retroduction. Retroduction is a creative, logical process that works backward from an observed phenomenon (at the empirical level) to postulate a plausible underlying mechanism (at the real level) that could account for it.25 This is a move from describing what happens to explaining why it happens.

This focus on deep, causal explanation is what gives CR its immense value for any project aimed at social change. Positivism can describe the correlation between zip code and life expectancy, but it struggles to explain the structural causes. Interpretivism can provide a rich account of the lived experience of poverty, but it may hesitate to make claims about the objective economic structures that perpetuate it.1 CR insists that to truly understand and address a social problem, one must identify and theorize the real, enduring, but often unobservable social structures and mechanisms that generate it.10 This explanatory power is inextricably linked to emancipation. If a social problem is explained away by a flawed theory (e.g., poverty is caused by individual laziness), the proposed “solution” will be ineffective and potentially harmful. By providing a better, deeper explanation of reality—one that accounts for systemic injustice and structural violence—CR provides the intellectual warrant for a more just and effective call for structural transformation. It bridges the classic “is/ought” divide by demonstrating that a false account of “what is” inevitably perpetuates an unjust status quo.19

Part III: The Scholar-Practitioner’s Vocation: Action Research through a Critical Realist Lens

Having established the theological and philosophical foundations, this final section synthesizes these elements into a practical model for the scholar-practitioner. It argues that Action Research (AR), when grounded in the robust ontology of Critical Realism and animated by a Christian vision of redemptive praxis, becomes a powerful methodology for effecting positive social change.

The Praxis of Transformation: An Introduction to Action Research (AR)

Action Research is a research philosophy and methodology uniquely suited to the scholar-practitioner because it intentionally combines research with action and participation.41 It is a form of systematic, self-reflective inquiry undertaken by participants in social situations to improve their own practices, their understanding of these practices, and the situations in which the practices are carried out.43 Rather than positioning the researcher as a detached expert who studies a community from the outside, AR empowers those within a situation to become co-researchers in investigating and transforming it themselves.45

The methodology is defined by its iterative, cyclical process, often visualized as a spiral.41 While models vary slightly, the core stages are consistent 48:

Plan: A problem of practice is identified, and a plan for intervention and data collection is developed.
Act: The plan is implemented; the intervention is carried out.
Observe: Data is systematically collected to monitor the action and its consequences.
Reflect: The data is analyzed, and the researcher (or research team) reflects on the outcomes to understand what happened and why. This reflection then informs a revised plan for the next cycle.

This process is not linear but continuous, with each cycle leading to a deeper understanding of the problem and more refined, effective action.41 It is this commitment to bridging the gap between theory and practice that makes AR so compelling for those, like the students of City Vision University, who are being trained to lead and serve within their communities.51

The Philosophical Concordance: Why AR Needs CR

While AR is a powerful practical methodology, it benefits immensely from the philosophical underpinning provided by Critical Realism.52 CR offers the theoretical depth needed to move AR from a simple problem-solving technique to a rigorous form of explanatory inquiry. There is a profound concordance between CR’s philosophical premises and AR’s methodological cycle, with CR providing the “why” for AR’s “how”.52

In the Planning Stage: A credible action plan requires a theory of the problem. Without one, an intervention is merely a shot in the dark. CR’s logic of retroduction provides the intellectual tools to move beyond surface-level symptoms to develop a robust, explanation-based plan. The scholar-practitioner asks: “What are the underlying generative mechanisms in the ‘real’ domain that are producing the undesirable events we observe in the ‘actual’ and ’empirical’ domains?” The plan then becomes a hypothesis about how to intervene at that deeper level.
In the Acting Stage: The “action” in AR is an intervention designed to alter the causal field. CR helps the researcher conceptualize this action not as a simple stimulus-response input, but as a strategic attempt to trigger positive generative mechanisms, block or counteract negative ones, and modify the contextual conditions that enable them. This provides a far more nuanced understanding of how change happens.
In the Observing and Reflecting Stages: The scholar-practitioner observes the results of the action in the empirical and actual domains. The crucial reflection stage then becomes a process of adjudicating the explanatory power of the initial theory. Did the outcome change as predicted? If so, this provides confirmatory evidence for the posited mechanism. If not, what does this tell us about the real mechanisms at play, or about other countervailing mechanisms that were not accounted for? This creates a rigorous, reality-based feedback loop for theory refinement, making the AR cycle a powerful engine for learning.34

A Christian Model for the Scholar-Practitioner: Redemptive Praxis

When this powerful combination of CR and AR is animated by a biblical worldview, it produces a holistic model for the Christian scholar-practitioner: redemptive praxis. Research ceases to be a purely academic exercise and becomes a form of discipleship. The AR cycle—informed by CR’s search for deep explanation and motivated by a biblical call to justice and restoration—is a disciplined, humble, and hopeful engagement with God’s world. It seeks to understand the world’s brokenness (the Fall) in light of its created goodness (Creation) in order to participate faithfully in its healing (Redemption).

A powerful, real-world example of this model in action can be found in the work of faith-based organizations like World Vision. Their “Citizen Voice and Action” (CVA) initiative in Uganda provides a compelling case study of this integrated approach.54

A Critical Realist Diagnosis: The CVA project began with an analysis of observable problems.
- Empirical Problem: Communities experienced low student test scores, high teacher and student absenteeism, and poor health clinic outcomes.55
- Actual Events: Teachers were not showing up for work, parents were not providing lunches for their children, and clinics lacked adequate staff and medicine.55
- Real Generative Mechanisms: A positivist approach might have simply correlated poverty with poor outcomes. An interpretivist approach might have documented feelings of hopelessness. The CVA project, however, correctly identified the deeper, real generative mechanisms: a lack of government accountability, a sense of community disempowerment and resignation, and a critical knowledge gap regarding citizens’ rights and government standards for service delivery.55 These were the unseen structures generating the visible problems.

Action Research in Practice: The CVA methodology is a clear example of an Action Research intervention. It was a planned, participatory action designed to alter these generative mechanisms.
- The Action: World Vision facilitated a process of civic education, community-generated monitoring scorecards, and “interface meetings” that brought citizens face-to-face with government officials and service providers.55
- The Goal: This intervention was designed to trigger new, positive mechanisms. By providing knowledge (civic education), it empowered citizen agency. By creating new forums for dialogue (interface meetings), it altered the relationship between citizens and the state structure. This transformed the system from one of passive dependency to one of active accountability.
- The Outcomes: The results were dramatic. An independent evaluation found statistically significant reductions in teacher absenteeism and improvements in test scores. World Vision’s own data showed schools receiving more teachers, student enrollment doubling or tripling, and clinics gaining more staff and resources. The intervention successfully altered the underlying mechanisms, leading to tangible change in the empirical domain.55

This work by a faith-based organization exemplifies a commitment to justice and empowerment rooted in Christian values. It is a practical outworking of the redemptive and restorative mission of the church, seeking the flourishing of the whole community.

The synthesis of a Christian worldview, Critical Realism, and Action Research provides the scholar-practitioner with a framework that is uniquely capable of handling the complexity of social problems without succumbing to either the technocratic overconfidence of positivism or the cynical despair of relativism. Social problems are complex, open systems where multiple causal mechanisms interact.3 The CR-AR cycle is not a magic bullet but a humble, iterative process of learning that acknowledges this complexity and the fallibility of our own theories and interventions. The “critical” aspect demands that we constantly test our assumptions against reality, while the “realism” aspect grounds our efforts in the belief that real change is possible because real causal structures exist and can be understood and altered. For the Christian, this entire process is undergirded by theological hope. We act not because we are certain of our own success, but because we are confident in God’s ultimate redemptive purposes. Our research and action are a faithful, albeit imperfect, participation in that larger divine project, providing the resilience needed to engage in long-term struggles for justice.

Conclusion

This paper has traced a logical path from the theological foundations of a Christian worldview to the philosophical architecture of Critical Realism, and finally to its methodological application in Action Research. The argument presented is that the biblical narrative of Creation, Fall, and Redemption does not simply accommodate a critical realist epistemology, but logically demands one. This theological-philosophical framework affirms an objective, God-created reality (the intransitive real) while acknowledging that our human perception of it is fallible and socially mediated (the transitive). It is through divine revelation and the renewing work of the Holy Spirit that we can achieve a progressively truer, though never exhaustive, understanding of this reality.

Critical Realism provides the intellectual tools to operationalize this worldview in research. Its stratified ontology—distinguishing between the empirical, the actual, and the real—compels the researcher to look beyond surface-level phenomena to uncover the deep, generative mechanisms that cause social problems. This search for causal explanation is the necessary prerequisite for any meaningful and sustainable social transformation.

Finally, Action Research offers the practical methodology through which the scholar-practitioner can enact this vision. Its iterative cycle of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting becomes a disciplined process of testing theories about reality and intervening to change it for the better. When grounded in CR, AR is elevated from a mere problem-solving heuristic to a rigorous, explanation-oriented form of inquiry.

The result is a holistic and integrated vision of the Christian scholar-practitioner: a person of faith who is also a rigorous theorist and a reflective practitioner. They are equipped to diagnose the deep, often hidden, causes of social suffering and to act collaboratively and humbly to foster healing and justice. It is a call to embrace this framework not as a rigid formula, but as a dynamic and hopeful posture for your future work—a way of conducting research that is at once intellectually robust, practically relevant, and theologically profound, ultimately serving as a vocational act of faith, hope, and love in a world that groans for restoration.

This report was generated by Google Gemini 2.5 Deep Research using the prompt:
“You are a professor in a doctoral course on Research Methods for Scholar Practitioners at City Vision University. Write a paper for graduate students in the course that explores:

1. The Biblical Basis for an epistemology of Critical Realism. Tie this in with some of the comments pasted below

2. An Overview of Critical Realism

3. How a Christian approach to Critical Realism forms a good epistemology for scholar practitioners using action research to bring positive social change.”
It was reviewed by Dr. Andrew Sears for accuracy.

Works cited

Critical Realism – Christian Smith – University of Notre Dame, accessed August 16, 2025, https://christiansmith.nd.edu/critical-realism/
Positivism, Constructivism, and Realism in Social Analysis – Dr Jack …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://jack-newman.co.uk/2019/07/26/approaching-social-analysis/
Critical realism (philosophy of the social sciences) – Wikipedia, accessed August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_realism_(philosophy_of_the_social_sciences)
Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation – PubMed, accessed August 16, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22212371/
What is the difference between constructivism, critical realism and phenomenlogy?, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-is-the-difference-between-constructivism-critical-realism-and-phenomenlogy
Critical Realism vs Social Constructionism & Social Constructivism: Application to to a social housing research study. International Journal of Sciences – Insight, accessed August 16, 2025, https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/3596/1/8701-25730-1-PB.pdf
Shaping a Christian Worldview: An Introduction (Part I) | Article …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.uu.edu/centers/faculty/teaching/article.cfm?ID=364
The Importance of a Christian Worldview – The Gospel Project – Lifeway, accessed August 16, 2025, https://gospelproject.lifeway.com/the-importance-of-a-christian-worldview/
Full article: Critical Realism: A Critical Evaluation, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2022.2080127
What is Critical Realism? – University of Warwick, accessed August 16, 2025, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ces/research/current/socialtheory/maps/criticalrealism/
Roy Bhaskar – Wikipedia, accessed August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Bhaskar
What is critical realism? | Roy Bhaskar – WordPress.com, accessed August 16, 2025, https://roybhaskar.wordpress.com/what-is-critical-realism/
Reformed Critical Realism as A Dynamic Intellectual Paradigm for …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://cace.org/reformed-critical-realism-as-a-dynamic-intellectual-paradigm-for-christian-educators/
Christians, Worldviews, and Wisdom – Ministry Magazine, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/2012/01/christians,-worldviews,-and-wisdom
Method in Theology and Science Part 3A: Critical Realism …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://davidopderbeck.com/tgdarkly/2013/05/14/method-in-theology-and-science-part-3a-critical-realism/
How should a Christian view realism? | GotQuestions.org, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-realism.html
What Do Christians Believe About Divine Revelation? – Ways to Learn at Ligonier.org, accessed August 16, 2025, https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/what-do-christians-believe-about-divine-revelation
N.T. Wright and Critical Realism: Part 1 | Theological Ramblings, accessed August 16, 2025, https://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/nt-wright-and-critical-realism-part-1/
Critical Realism and Social Science – Philosophy Stack Exchange, accessed August 16, 2025, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/33794/critical-realism-and-social-science
Divine Revelation: God Making Himself Known – The Gospel Coalition, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/divine-revelation-god-making-known/
Are Divine Revelation and Human Reason Mutually Exclusive? – Crossway, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.crossway.org/articles/are-divine-revelation-and-human-reason-mutually-exclusive/
Theological critical realism – Wikipedia, accessed August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theological_critical_realism
Critical realism and the Bible | olem – Theology, archaeology, science, accessed August 16, 2025, https://0lem.wordpress.com/2014/06/02/critical-realism-bible/
Biblical Apologetics Lesson 2: The Christian View of Knowledge | G3 Ministries, accessed August 16, 2025, https://g3min.org/biblical-apologetics-study/lesson-2-the-christian-view-of-knowledge/
How does critical realism relate to critical theory? – | Social Theory Applied, accessed August 16, 2025, https://socialtheoryapplied.com/2019/02/26/how-does-critical-realism-relate-to-critical-theory/
Theory and Action for Emancipation: Elements of a Critical Realist Approach, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46298797_Theory_and_Action_for_Emancipation_Elements_of_a_Critical_Realist_Approach
PDF – Exploring critical realism as the theoretical foundation of mixed-method research – working paper, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/wp1003.pdf
A Realist Theory Of Science by Roy Bhaskar | Goodreads, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1245157.A_Realist_Theory_Of_Science
Critical Realism and Christianity – Peter Lang Verlag, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.peterlang.com/document/1403667
(PDF) A realist theory of science (1974) | Roy Bhaskar | 3652 Citations – SciSpace, accessed August 16, 2025, https://scispace.com/papers/a-realist-theory-of-science-2f4urlqyxl
en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Bhaskar#:~:text=The%20core%20argument%20of%20A,constant%20conjunction%20of%20events%20perceived%22.
Analysis Of Roy Bhaskar Roy: A Realist Theory Of Science – Cram, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.cram.com/essay/Analysis-Of-Roy-Bhaskar-Roy-A-Realist/FCAVJU7ZVG
Critical realism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/critical-realism
Critical realism: an explanatory framework for small-scale qualitative …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1966623
Stratified ontology of critical realism | Download Scientific Diagram – ResearchGate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Stratified-ontology-of-critical-realism_fig3_338020141
Critical Realism: A Framework to Understand Organizations …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/bcanders2000/chapter/critical-realism-a-framework-to-understand-organizations/
Critical Realism – A simple explanation for beginners – Degree Doctor®, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.thedegreedoctor.com/blog/critical-realism-a-simple-explanation-for-beginners
Why things happen – Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms – University of Kent, accessed August 16, 2025, https://kar.kent.ac.uk/62468/1/Making%20Things%20Happen%20IO%20R1.pdf
Analysis of Generative Mechanisms | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270415793_Analysis_of_Generative_Mechanisms
Roy Bhaskar – Transcendental Realism – Critical Realism Network, accessed August 16, 2025, https://criticalrealismnetwork.org/critical-realism/
Carry out action research – Emerald Publishing, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/how-to/research-methods/carry-out-action-research
Action research – Wikipedia, accessed August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research
Action research: when the practitioner becomes the researcher. An essay by Dr Penny Lacey – TAC Interconnections, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tacinterconnections.com/index.php/allnews/commentopinion/1035-action-research-when-the-practitioner-becomes-the-researcher-an-essay-by-dr-penny-lacey
Making Sense of Methods: What Does Systematic and Intentional Practitioner Research Look Like? – Digital Commons @ USF – University of South Florida, accessed August 16, 2025, https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1195&context=jpr
11.3 Action research – Foundations of Social Work Research – Mavs Open Press, accessed August 16, 2025, https://uta.pressbooks.pub/foundationsofsocialworkresearch/chapter/11-3-action-research/
The philosophical foundations of participatory action research: pragmatism, critical theory, constructivism, feminist epistemology and participatory democracy | Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Insight, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/qrj-07-2024-0151/full/html
About Action Resarch | Action Research Tututoials | CCAR, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.actionresearchtutorials.org/1-about-action-research
ctl.oregonstate.edu, accessed August 16, 2025, https://ctl.oregonstate.edu/sites/ctl.oregonstate.edu/files/action-research.pdf
Figure 1. The cyclical and ongoing nature of action research, depicted as… | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, accessed August 16, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/education/oxford/fullsizeimage?imageUri=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-696-graphic-001-full.gif&uriChapter=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-696
1. What is Action Research for Classroom Teachers? – New Prairie Press, accessed August 16, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/context/ebooks/article/1034/filename/3/type/additional/viewcontent/1._What_is_Action_Research_for_Classroom_Teachers.pdf
A Typology of Action Research for Scholar-Practitioners – ResearchGate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388314825_A_Typology_of_Action_Research_for_Scholar-Practitioners
Prising Open the Black Box: Critical Realism, Action Research and …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249675251_Prising_Open_the_Black_Box_Critical_Realism_Action_Research_and_Social_Work
Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work – Queen’s University Belfast, accessed August 16, 2025, https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/publications/prising-open-the-black-box-critical-realism-action-research-and-s
Our Urban Evidence Base – World Vision International, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.wvi.org/our-work/urban-programming/world-visions-urban-programmes
Citizen Voice and Action- Civic demand for better health and …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.worldvision.com.au/docs/default-source/publications/children/citizen-voice-and-action–civic-demand-for-better-health-and-education-services.pdf?sfvrsn=6publication/citizen-voice-and-action-project-model