Knowledge Domain Mapping with Lucidchart

1. Introduction: Navigating the Landscape of Knowledge for Transformative Leadership
2. Part I: The Foundations of Knowledge Domain Mapping: Understanding the Scholarly Landscape
   1. Section 1.1: Charting the Scholarly World: A Conceptual and Historical Overview
   2. Section 1.2: Literature Mapping as the Path to Knowledge Analysis
   3. Section 1.3: The Strategic Imperative for the Doctoral Researcher
3. Part II: A Practical Guide to Knowledge Domain Mapping with Lucidchart
   1. Section 2.1: Selecting Your Instrument: From Specialized Software to Accessible Visualization
   2. Section 2.2: A Step-by-Step Guide to Building Your Knowledge Domain Map in Lucidchart
   3. Section 2.3: An Applied Example: Mapping “Strategic Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations”
4. Conclusion: From Map-Maker to Knowledge-Builder: Your Role in the Scholarly Conversation

Works cited

Introduction: Navigating the Landscape of Knowledge for Transformative Leadership

The doctoral journey, and particularly the dissertation, is an endeavor of profound intellectual and personal significance. It is not merely a final academic requirement but an expedition into a vast and often uncharted intellectual territory. In this expedition, the scholar must assume the role of a cartographer—one who meticulously charts the existing landscape before attempting to build upon it or explore its frontiers. This responsibility is both a challenge and an opportunity, especially for scholar-practitioners committed to transformative leadership.

Contemporary researchers face an unprecedented challenge: an “explosion of the amount of information available”.15 The sheer volume of publications, data, and discourse can be overwhelming. For a doctoral candidate, simply reading a selection of articles is insufficient; it is akin to studying a few individual trees while remaining oblivious to the structure of the entire forest.15 To make a truly original contribution, one must first grasp the panoramic view—the contours of the debates, the foundations of the theories, and the pathways of influence that define a field of study.1

This is the purpose of Knowledge Domain Mapping (KDM). KDM is a powerful scholarly methodology defined as “the process of charting, mining, analyzing, sorting, enabling navigation of, and displaying knowledge”.15 It provides the tools to move beyond a linear literature review and create a visual, structural, and dynamic representation of a scholarly domain. It allows the researcher to see the “development process and structural relationships of scientific knowledge” 1, transforming a chaotic flood of information into an ordered, navigable map.

From the perspective of City Vision University, this practice resonates deeply with our core values. It is a direct application of Technology not as an end in itself, but as a means to serve a higher purpose.5 By making the often-opaque structures of academic discourse transparent and accessible, KDM promotes a form of intellectual Justice, empowering new voices to enter the conversation with clarity and confidence.5 Furthermore, the act of mapping one’s field requires a profound sense of scholarly humility—an understanding of one’s place within a long tradition of inquiry—that is central to a Bible-centered worldview that values wisdom and understanding.5

This report is designed to equip you, the doctoral candidate, for this essential task. It has a dual purpose. Part I will provide the theoretical and historical foundations of Knowledge Domain Mapping, exploring why it is a critical competency for any serious scholar. Part II will offer a practical, step-by-step guide to conducting this mapping using the accessible and versatile tools within Lucidchart. The ultimate goal is to empower you to conduct rigorous, insightful research that not only fulfills the requirements of a doctorate but also lays the groundwork for a lifetime of leadership that is informed, innovative, and transformative.13

Part I: The Foundations of Knowledge Domain Mapping: Understanding the Scholarly Landscape

Section 1.1: Charting the Scholarly World: A Conceptual and Historical Overview

Imagine trying to understand a new city by only reading a list of street addresses. You would know where things are, but you would have no sense of the city’s layout, its major neighborhoods, or how the streets connect. This is often what a traditional literature review feels like. Knowledge Domain Mapping, at its heart, is about creating the city map. It’s a way to visually organize all the information in a field of study to see the big picture.1 Instead of just a list of facts, you get a graph or a mind map that shows you the main ideas, how they relate to each other, and how the entire field has developed over time.1

The basic human desire to organize information is ancient, something librarians and philosophers have been doing for thousands of years.15 However, the modern version of this practice has been supercharged by technology. The explosion of digital information from the internet and academic databases means we have more information than ever before.15 At the same time, powerful computers give us the ability to sort through this flood of data in ways that were previously impossible.18

The goal of creating these maps is simple: to bring clarity. For someone new to a field, a knowledge map provides an entry point, a way to quickly understand the main landmarks and highways of the conversation.19 For an expert, it can confirm what they already know and sometimes reveal surprising new developments they hadn’t noticed.19 Ultimately, it helps you move from seeing just a “few nearby trees in the forest of knowledge” to understanding the “entire landscape”.15 This is especially important for City Vision students, as using technology to make complex information accessible and understandable is a core part of our mission to innovate for the common good.5

Section 1.2: Literature Mapping as the Path to Knowledge Analysis

So, how do you build this map of your academic field? The process is called literature mapping, and it’s the practical first step toward the bigger goal of knowledge domain analysis. Think of it this way:

• Literature Mapping is the action you take. It’s the process of reading articles and books and literally mapping out what you find. You draw the connections between ideas, authors, and theories. It’s like being a cartographer, drawing the roads and landmarks on your map.
• Knowledge Domain Analysis is the understanding you gain from looking at the finished map. It’s when you step back, look at the patterns you’ve drawn, and analyze what they mean. You’re no longer just a cartographer; you’re a city planner, understanding why the neighborhoods are where they are and how the city functions as a whole.

The process of literature mapping isn’t random; you are looking for specific, simple patterns in the information you gather. As you read, you can map out:

• The Main Topics: You can identify the key themes in a field by noticing which keywords and concepts appear together most often. When you see the same terms being used across many articles, you’ve likely found a major topic. You can then draw this as a central hub on your mind map.19
• The Key Thinkers: You can discover the most influential scholars by noticing which authors are cited or mentioned most frequently, especially when different writers mention the same two or three foundational thinkers together. These are the people who have shaped the conversation, and they become major landmarks on your map.19
• The Social Network: You can map the social structure of a field by paying attention to who works with whom. When you see the same authors publishing together repeatedly, you’ve identified a research team or a school of thought. This helps you understand where the key research centers are.19
• The Current Hot Spots: You can spot emerging trends by looking at the newest articles and seeing which older works they all refer back to. When a cluster of new papers all build on the same foundation, you’ve found a “research front”—an active and current area of investigation.2

By focusing on these simple patterns, your literature mapping becomes a systematic way of building a rich, visual representation of your field. This map isn’t just a collection of notes; it’s a structured analysis of a “discourse community”—a group of scholars with shared histories, ideas, and debates.20

Section 1.3: The Strategic Imperative for the Doctoral Researcher

Creating a knowledge map is more than a helpful study aid; it’s a strategic necessity for producing high-quality doctoral research. It fundamentally changes your relationship with the literature and empowers you to make a truly original contribution.

From Literature “Review” to Literature “Analysis”

A traditional literature review often involves simply summarizing one article after another. Knowledge mapping forces you to perform a true analysis. By physically connecting ideas on a mind map, you are actively constructing a model of the field’s knowledge structure.2 This process promotes a form of “deep learning,” where you move beyond memorizing facts to understanding the very nature of the knowledge in your field.4 This active, hands-on approach builds a much stronger and more lasting understanding than passive reading alone.4

This process also helps you develop your own expertise. As you build your map, you are creating a visual record of your own competence and research capabilities.21 The map is both a window into your field and a mirror reflecting your growing understanding. This is how experts develop the rich, context-sensitive knowledge that separates them from novices.22

Answering the Critical Questions

A well-constructed knowledge map is the most efficient way to answer the key questions every doctoral student must address 1:

1. What are the core problems the field is trying to solve?
2. Who are the most important thinkers and what are their biggest ideas?
3. What are the main topics and sub-topics being discussed?
4. How do these different topics and thinkers relate to one another?
5. What are the newest trends and where is the field heading next?

Identifying the Research Gap

Perhaps the most powerful benefit of creating a knowledge map is its ability to make “knowledge gaps” visually obvious.21 An original dissertation must fill one of these gaps. When you have a map of the entire landscape, you can clearly see:

• Empty Spaces: Areas on your map where there are few or no connections between important ideas.
• Unexplored Intersections: Opportunities to connect two different clusters of research that haven’t been linked before.
• Faint Lines: Nascent trends or new ideas that are just beginning to appear and are ripe for further investigation.

Situating Your Contribution

Finally, your knowledge map gives you the evidence to explain why your research matters. It allows you to confidently tell your dissertation committee: “Here is a map of the existing conversation, here is the specific gap I have identified, and here is how my work will fill that gap.” This ability to clearly situate your own work within the broader scholarly landscape is a critical skill for any doctoral graduate and is essential for a successful dissertation and future publications.23

Part II: A Practical Guide to Knowledge Domain Mapping with Lucidchart

Having established the theoretical importance of Knowledge Domain Mapping, we now turn to its practical application. This section provides a step-by-step guide for constructing a knowledge map using Lucidchart, a widely accessible and versatile visualization platform.

Section 2.1: Selecting Your Instrument: From Specialized Software to Accessible Visualization

The world of KDM includes a spectrum of software tools, each with its own strengths and purposes. It is important to understand this landscape to select the right instrument for the task at hand.

The Spectrum of Tools

At the high end of the spectrum are specialized scientometric software packages like CiteSpace and VOSviewer.1 These are powerful, data-driven tools designed to connect directly to large bibliographic databases (such as Web of Science or Scopus), ingest thousands of publication records, and automatically generate knowledge maps based on the analytical methods discussed in Part I (e.g., co-citation, co-authorship). They are the instruments of choice for large-scale, quantitative, bibliometric studies.

The Case for Lucidchart

For the doctoral student engaged in the process of a deep literature review, however, a different approach can be more pedagogically valuable. This guide recommends Lucidchart not because it automates scientometric analysis—it does not—but because its strength lies in its accessibility and flexibility for manual conceptual mapping. The process of building a map by hand, based on one’s own reading and critical analysis, forces a level of engagement and “deep learning” that automated tools can sometimes bypass.4 This deliberate, constructive process deeply embeds the knowledge in the researcher’s mind. This approach aligns perfectly with City Vision’s emphasis on practical, accessible technology that empowers the user and fosters genuine understanding.5

Crucial Distinction: Mind Maps vs. Concept Maps

Before beginning, it is methodologically critical to understand a key distinction. Lucidchart is often marketed as a “mind map maker”.6 However, for the rigorous academic task of KDM, we will be using its features to create a

concept map. The difference is not merely semantic; it is fundamental to the nature of the exercise.8

• Mind Maps are primarily brainstorming tools. They have a radial structure, starting with a single central idea and branching outwards. They are used to generate and organize one’s own thoughts in a flexible, informal way.9
• Concept Maps, in contrast, are knowledge representation tools. They have a more complex hierarchical or network structure and are used to represent an existing body of knowledge (like a scientific theory or a scholarly field). Their most defining feature is the use of explicit linking words or phrases on the lines connecting concepts, which describe the precise relationship between them. This makes them more formal and structurally rigorous.8

Therefore, while we will use the tools available in Lucidchart’s mind mapping environment, our goal is to construct a methodologically sound concept map that accurately represents the knowledge domain of your dissertation research.

Section 2.2: A Step-by-Step Guide to Building Your Knowledge Domain Map in Lucidchart

This tutorial will guide you through the process of building your knowledge map, integrating the practical steps of using the software with the theoretical principles of KDM.

Phase 1: Preparation and Setup

1. Define Your Focus Question: Every rigorous concept map begins with a focus question that defines its scope and purpose.8 This question will guide every decision you make. It is the intellectual anchor for your map. For example, a student in a leadership program might ask: “What are the primary theoretical models, key empirical findings, and current debates in the study of servant leadership within nonprofit organizations?”
2. Create Your Lucidchart Account and Document: Begin by navigating to the Lucidchart website and creating a free account or logging in.11 Once in your dashboard, click the
   + New button and select a Blank Document.11 While templates are available, starting with a blank canvas encourages a more deliberate and personalized construction process that reflects your unique path through the literature.

Phase 2: Laying the Foundation – Identifying Core Concepts

1. Initial Brainstorming & Parking Lot: As you begin your literature review, start compiling a list of the most important concepts, seminal authors, foundational theories, key methodologies, and major debates in your field. This running list, often called a “parking lot,” serves as your inventory of potential nodes for the map.9
2. Creating Primary Nodes: From the “Elements Menu” on the left side of the Lucidchart canvas, drag shapes onto the canvas to represent the most central and general concepts from your parking lot.11 These will be the main pillars of your map. For our servant leadership example, you might create primary nodes for “Servant Leadership Theory (Greenleaf),” “Transformational Leadership (Bass),” “Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” and “Nonprofit Effectiveness.”

Phase 3: Populating the Map – Adding Scholarly Artifacts

1. Adding Sub-Nodes: As your reading deepens, add more specific concepts as child nodes connected to your primary nodes. Lucidchart makes this easy: you can use the Tab key to create a child idea or simply drag a line out from an existing shape to create a new, connected one.9 These sub-nodes can represent specific influential papers (e.g., “Liden et al., 2008 study”), key empirical findings (e.g., “Positive correlation with team performance”), or individual researchers associated with a theory.
2. Customization for Clarity: A key advantage of a visual map is the ability to create a clear visual language. Use the formatting menus at the top of the screen to customize your map.11
   • Shapes: Assign different shapes to different types of information to make your map instantly readable. For instance: Ovals for broad theories, Rectangles for specific authors, Diamonds for seminal papers, and Hexagons for key methodologies.
   • Colors: Use color-coding to group thematic clusters. All nodes related to theoretical development could be blue, all nodes related to empirical evidence could be green, and all nodes related to critiques or alternative models could be red. The “Branch Fill” option can automate some of this.11
   • Images: Add images, such as author headshots or book covers, to make the map more visually engaging and to aid memory.10

Phase 4: Weaving the Web – Creating Meaningful Connections

This is the most critical phase, where your diagram transforms into a genuine concept map.

1. The Power of Linking Words: Simply connecting two nodes with a line is not enough. You must describe the relationship between them. Drag connector lines between your nodes. Then, double-click on the line to add a text box. In this box, write a concise linking phrase that specifies the relationship.9 Examples are essential: “is a critique of,” “provides empirical support for,” “was developed by,” “is measured using,” “contrasts with,” “is a specific application of.” These phrases are the grammatical glue that turns a collection of concepts into a set of meaningful propositions.
2. Showing Hierarchy and Flow: Arrange your map logically. Place the most general, foundational concepts near the top or center, with more specific, subordinate concepts branching out from them. This creates a clear visual hierarchy.9 Use arrows on your connector lines to indicate the direction of influence or logical flow (e.g., from a theory to a study that tests it).

Phase 5: Analysis and Refinement

1. Identifying Cross-Links: Once your map has several distinct branches, actively look for opportunities to create “cross-links”—connections between concepts in different domains of your map.9 For example, you might draw a line from a specific measurement scale under “Servant Leadership” to a study in the “Nonprofit Effectiveness” branch that utilized it. These cross-links often represent the most profound insights, revealing the hidden web of connections that constitutes deep disciplinary knowledge.
2. Iterative Process: A knowledge map is not a one-time creation; it is a living document that should evolve with your understanding. As you read more, you will constantly need to add, remove, and reorganize nodes and links. Lucidchart’s drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to move entire branches and restructure your map as your mental model of the field becomes more sophisticated.12
3. Using AI for Summarization: After your map is well-developed, you can leverage Lucidchart’s Collaborative AI features. Select a cluster of nodes and ask the AI to summarize them. This can be an excellent way to generate a first draft of a paragraph for your literature review, ensuring your writing is grounded in the structure you have so carefully mapped.10

The following table provides a direct bridge between the goals of KDM and the specific actions you can take within Lucidchart.

KDM Goal	Lucidchart Element(s)	Action & Rationale
Identify a Foundational Theory	Central Parent Node (Large Shape)	Place the theory in a large, distinctly colored shape at the top or center of the map to visually signify its foundational importance and centrality to the domain.
Show an Intellectual Debate	Paired Nodes with Opposing Connectors	Connect two competing theories (e.g., Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership) with a double-headed arrow labeled with a linking phrase like “in tension with” or “offers a critique of” to visualize the core conflict.
Map a Research Front	Color-Coded Cluster of Recent Papers	Group related, recently published articles with a shared background color. Label the entire cluster (e.g., “Emerging Trend: AI in Leadership Coaching”) to clearly highlight a current, active area of research and a potential gap to explore.
Trace a Concept’s Evolution	Timeline Layout with Dated Nodes	Arrange nodes representing a single concept (e.g., “sustainability”) chronologically from left to right, using linking phrases like “evolved into” or “was redefined as” to show how its meaning has changed over time.
Distinguish Theory from Evidence	Different Shapes and Connector Types	Use ovals for theoretical concepts and rectangles for empirical studies. Connect them with a solid line labeled “tested by” for direct tests, and a dashed line labeled “is consistent with” for indirect support, creating a nuanced view of the evidence base.

Section 2.3: An Applied Example: Mapping “Strategic Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations”

To make this process tangible, let us walk through a condensed, hypothetical example of building a knowledge map for a doctoral student focusing on strategic leadership in nonprofit organizations, a topic highly relevant to many programs at City Vision.13

Stage 1: Foundation

The student begins by creating primary nodes for the foundational pillars of the field. The canvas shows four large ovals: “Servant Leadership,” “Transformational Leadership,” “Nonprofit Governance,” and “Resource Development.” These represent the broad conceptual areas the student’s initial reading has identified as critical.

Stage 2: Population

Next, the student populates the map with key artifacts. Under “Servant Leadership,” they add a rectangular node for “Robert K. Greenleaf” and connect it with the linking phrase “originated by.” Under “Transformational Leadership,” a node for “Bernard M. Bass” is added. A diamond-shaped node for the influential text “Good to Great and the Social Sectors” by Jim Collins is placed near “Nonprofit Governance,” linked with the phrase “provides a framework for.” Each addition is a conscious act of placing a piece of knowledge into a structural context.

Stage 3: Connection & Analysis

This is where deep meaning emerges. The student draws a connector between “Servant Leadership” and “Transformational Leadership” and labels it with the linking phrase “is often contrasted with,” immediately visualizing a core theoretical debate. They begin to use color-coding: all nodes related to financial topics (like “Fundraising,” “Grant Writing”) under “Resource Development” are colored green, while nodes related to mission and impact (like “Program Evaluation,” “Stakeholder Theory”) are colored purple.

Deriving Insights

As the map grows, its visual structure begins to yield insights. The student notices a dense web of connections between the “Transformational Leadership” cluster and the green “Financial Sustainability” cluster. Many studies link this leadership style to improved fundraising outcomes. However, they observe a conspicuous lack of connections—a visual void—between the leadership nodes and a newer sub-cluster they’ve created called “Long-Term Volunteer Retention.” This visual gap is not just an empty space on the canvas; it represents a potential knowledge gap in the scholarly literature. The map has just provided a powerful, evidence-based justification for a dissertation research question: “What is the relationship between servant leadership practices and long-term volunteer retention in faith-based nonprofit organizations?” The map has successfully guided the scholar from a broad topic to a specific, researchable, and significant problem.

Conclusion: From Map-Maker to Knowledge-Builder: Your Role in the Scholarly Conversation

This report has guided you from the theoretical foundations of Knowledge Domain Mapping to its practical execution. We have seen that KDM is far more than a method for organizing notes; it is a rigorous methodology for achieving a deep, structured, and panoramic understanding of a scholarly field. It transforms the literature review from a passive summary into an active analysis, enabling the researcher to identify the intellectual architecture, historical trajectories, and critical gaps within their chosen domain. The process is one of both analysis and self-development, shaping the researcher’s own expertise as they map the work of others.

For the applied doctoral students at City Vision University, the map is not the final destination. It is the foundation upon which new knowledge must be built—knowledge that is designed for action. The clarity gained from mapping a domain is the precursor to being able to “implement data-driven solutions to today’s leadership challenges” and “promote ethical and sustainable organizations”.13 A leader who understands the complete landscape of a problem is far better equipped to devise innovative and effective solutions than one who has only seen a small part of it.

The journey of creating a knowledge map is demanding. It requires patience, critical thinking, and a willingness to revise one’s understanding as new information comes to light. Yet, the reward is immense. This process transforms the doctoral candidate from a passive consumer of information into an active participant and, ultimately, a future contributor to the scholarly conversation. It is a vital step in becoming the kind of leader our world so desperately needs: one who can navigate complexity with wisdom, build upon the foundations of the past, and chart a course toward a more just and sustainable future.

This document was generated by Google Gemini 2.5 Deep Research using the prompt:
“You are a professor at City Vision University writing for doctoral students. Write:

1. The background and importance of knowledge domain mapping

2. How to do knowledge domain mapping using the mind map tool in Lucidchart”.
It was reviewed by Dr. Andrew Sears for accuracy.

Works cited

1. Mapping Knowledge Domains – A Powerful Tool to Explore …, accessed July 20, 2025, https://en.tju.edu.cn/info/1010/2984.htm
2. Mapping knowledge domains | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8903307_Mapping_knowledge_domains
3. (PDF) Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Smart Education Research – ResearchGate, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356668401_Mapping_Knowledge_Domain_Analysis_in_Smart_Education_Research
4. Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3097
5. Our Mission and History – About City Vision University, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.cityvision.edu/about/
6. Mind Map Maker – Lucidspark – Lucid Software, accessed July 20, 2025, https://lucid.co/lucidspark/create/mind-map-maker
7. Diagrams and Tutorials | Lucidchart Learning Center, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/tour
8. Concept Mapping and Knowledge Modeling: A Multi-Disciplinary Educational, Informational, and Communication Technology, accessed July 20, 2025, https://iiisci.org/Journal/pdv/sci/pdfs/IP103LL20.pdf
9. Concept Mapping Guide and Tutorial | Lucidchart, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/tutorial/concept-map
10. How to Make a Mind Map – Guide & Templates | Lucidchart, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/tutorial/how-to-make-a-mind-map
11. 2025 Guide: Using Lucidchart To Create Mind Maps, accessed July 20, 2025, https://edrawmax.wondershare.com/mind-map/lucidchart-mind-map.html
12. Create mind maps in Lucidspark – YouTube, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyOsFa0Ed1g
13. Doctor of Education in Leadership – PhD Educational Leadership …, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.cityu.edu/programs-overview/doctor-education-leadership/
14. City Vision University – CLA – Christian Leadership Alliance, accessed July 20, 2025, https://christianleadershipalliance.org/outcomes-academy/ccnl/city-vision-university/
15. Mapping knowledge domains | PNAS, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0307852100
16. Mapping knowledge domains – PMC, accessed July 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC387293/
17. en.tju.edu.cn, accessed July 20, 2025, https://en.tju.edu.cn/info/1010/2984.htm#:~:text=Knowledge%20domain%20maps%20are%20graphs,informatics%2C%20computer%20science%20and%20more.
18. Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0307509100
19. (PDF) Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS – ResearchGate, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5243146_Mapping_knowledge_domains_Characterizing_PNAS
20. Domain analysis (IEKO), accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/domain_analysis
21. USE OF KNOWLEDGE MAPS TO RECOGNIZE DIFFERENT RESEARCH CAPABILITIES | The Design Society, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/25952/use_of_knowledge_maps_to_recognize_different_research_capabilities
22. Situating TPACK: A Systematic Literature Review of Context as a Domain of Knowledge, accessed July 20, 2025, https://citejournal.org/volume-22/issue-4-22/general/situating-tpack-a-systematic-literature-review-of-context-as-a-domain-of-knowledge/
23. A systematic review of doctoral graduate attributes: Domains and definitions – Frontiers, accessed July 20, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106/full