AI Literature Review Guide

Introduction: A Guide for the Practitioner-Scholar in the AI Era
Part 1: Navigating the Landscape of Academic Research Tools
Part 2: The Researcher’s Role in the Age of AI: Human-Led vs. AI-Assisted Reviews
Part 3: A Practical Guide to Conducting a Literature Review with Google Deep Research
Part 4: Managing Your Sources: Citations, Bibliographies, and Zotero Integration
1. Generating Reference Lists in Gemini
2. Step-by-Step Workflow for Zotero Integration

Introduction: A Guide for the Practitioner-Scholar in the AI Era

Purpose and Audience

This guide is designed specifically for doctoral students in City Vision University’s Doctorate in Organizational Leadership and Innovation program. It recognizes and addresses the unique position of its students as practitioner-scholars who employ the action research methodology to create tangible, positive change within Christian social services contexts. The primary objective is to equip these leaders with the advanced skills necessary to leverage powerful Artificial Intelligence (AI) research tools—particularly Google’s Gemini with its Deep Research feature—responsibly, ethically, and effectively. The focus is on enhancing, not replacing, the scholarly rigor, critical inquiry, and theological reflection that are hallmarks of a City Vision education. This manual provides the practical instruction needed to navigate the evolving landscape of academic research with confidence and competence.

The New Research Paradigm

The advent of sophisticated AI has fundamentally altered the landscape of academic research. The traditional, often solitary, process of sifting through vast libraries of information is being augmented by tools that can search, synthesize, and even generate text at an unprecedented scale. This shift does not diminish the role of the scholar; rather, it redefines it. The emerging paradigm is one of a hybrid approach, where the computational efficiency of AI is strategically paired with the indispensable critical thinking, contextual understanding, and ethical judgment of the human researcher.1 For the action researcher, this presents a powerful opportunity. AI can accelerate the process of gathering and summarizing broad information, freeing up valuable time for the more critical tasks of deep analysis, community engagement, practical implementation, and reflective practice that are central to the action research cycle. This guide is built on the premise that the most effective doctoral researcher in the 21st century will be one who can master this human-AI collaboration.

A Word of Caution: The Principle of “Trust but Verify”

A foundational theme that will echo throughout this guide is the principle of “trust but verify.” Generative AI tools, for all their power, are not infallible sources of truth. They are designed to generate plausible-sounding text based on patterns in their training data, not to verify facts. This can lead to a significant and dangerous flaw known as “hallucination,” where the AI confidently fabricates information, including non-existent authors, articles, and data.3 Presenting such a fabricated citation in a doctoral dissertation would represent a catastrophic failure of academic integrity. Therefore, while these tools can be powerful assistants, they must never be treated as authorities. Every claim, every summary, and especially every citation generated by an AI must be subjected to rigorous human verification against original sources.5 This guide will provide concrete, step-by-step workflows to mitigate these risks, ensuring that the use of AI enhances scholarly work while upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and intellectual honesty.

Part 1: Navigating the Landscape of Academic Research Tools

To effectively leverage AI in a literature review, a practitioner-scholar must first understand the ecosystem of available tools. This landscape ranges from massive, traditional academic search engines to sophisticated, AI-powered navigators and agentic research assistants. Each tool has a distinct purpose, a unique set of strengths, and critical limitations. Making a strategic choice about which tool to use at which stage of the research process is a foundational skill for modern scholarship. This section provides a comparative analysis of three key platforms: Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Google Deep Research.

The Foundation: Google Scholar (The Global Index)

Google Scholar serves as the de facto starting point for most academic research, functioning as a massive, cross-disciplinary index of scholarly literature.6

Corpus and Scope

Google Scholar’s primary strength is its immense scale. While exact figures are not published, it is estimated to index well over 200 million records, making it the largest academic search engine available.6 Its scope is exceptionally broad, encompassing not only peer-reviewed journal articles but also a wide array of other scholarly and quasi-scholarly materials. This includes theses and dissertations, books, abstracts, conference papers, preprints, technical reports, and even court opinions.7 For the action researcher focused on practical problems, this breadth is particularly valuable, as Google Scholar can be an effective tool for discovering “grey literature”—such as reports from government agencies, non-profits, and professional societies—when the appropriate keywords are used in the search query.10

Search Mechanism

The search mechanism is fundamentally keyword-based, operating with the familiar simplicity of the main Google search engine.12 Results are ranked using an algorithm that heavily prioritizes two factors: the presence of keywords in the title of the work and, most significantly, the total number of citations the work has received.6 This citation-weighting system means that seminal, foundational, and highly influential papers in a given field tend to rise to the top of the search results, making it an excellent tool for quickly identifying the cornerstone literature on a topic.

Strengths for the Doctoral Researcher

Unmatched Scale and Coverage: Its sheer size makes it an indispensable tool for initial, exploratory searches on almost any topic. It often contains references that may not appear in more narrowly focused library databases.6
Simplicity and Accessibility: The user interface is intuitive for anyone familiar with Google, lowering the barrier to entry for conducting initial searches.12
Powerful Citation Chaining: The “Cited by” link beneath each search result is one of its most powerful features. This form of forward citation searching allows a researcher to take a known, relevant paper and instantly find a list of all other indexed papers that have cited it. This is an invaluable technique for tracing the evolution of an idea and discovering more recent research that builds upon a foundational work.6 The “Related articles” feature provides an alternative, algorithmically-driven path to discovering similar literature.14
Basic Citation Management: Google Scholar provides pre-formatted citations in several common styles, including APA, and offers direct export links for popular bibliography managers like BibTeX, which can then be imported into tools like Zotero.12

Critical Limitations

Lack of Curation and Quality Control: Google Scholar does not provide its criteria for what it considers “scholarly.” The index includes a mix of peer-reviewed articles, student papers, and other content of varying quality. This places the full burden of critical evaluation and source validation on the researcher.12
Rudimentary Search and Filtering: Compared to specialized library databases, its search functionality is basic. It does not support complex, nested Boolean operators (e.g., (A OR B) AND (C NOT D)), does not allow filtering by specific document fields (like abstract or methodology), and does not utilize controlled vocabularies (like the National Library of Medicine’s MeSH terms) for precision searching.6 Furthermore, search queries are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which can hinder the construction of highly complex search strings.6
Relevance Over Recency: The default sorting algorithm, which prioritizes highly-cited works, often pushes the most recent publications down in the results list. A newly published, potentially groundbreaking article with few citations may be buried on the tenth page of results. Researchers must be diligent in using the “Sort by date” or “Since Year” filters to counteract this bias and locate the most current scholarship.12
Paywall Barriers: Google Scholar indexes content from across the web, regardless of accessibility. It frequently links to articles that are behind publisher paywalls. Students must remember not to pay for these articles and instead use their university library’s proxy or database access to obtain the full text for free.12

The AI-Powered Colleague: Semantic Scholar (The Intelligent Navigator)

Developed by the Allen Institute for AI (AI2), a non-profit research institute, Semantic Scholar represents a significant evolution from traditional search engines. It is designed not just to find documents, but to help researchers understand them.18

Corpus and Scope

Semantic Scholar’s corpus is comparable in size to Google Scholar’s, indexing over 200 million academic papers from a wide range of fields.20 Its content is sourced through partnerships with major academic publishers (like Springer Nature, Wiley, and SAGE), data providers (like PubMed), and web crawls of open-access repositories.22 While its initial focus was on computer science and biomedicine, the platform has since expanded to become fully multidisciplinary, covering the sciences, social sciences, and humanities.23

Search Mechanism

The core innovation of Semantic Scholar is its reliance on semantic search. Unlike keyword-based systems, it employs AI, machine learning, and natural language processing (NLP) to comprehend the meaning, intent, and context of a search query.7 This allows a researcher to ask a question in natural language (e.g., “What are the effects of faith-based recovery programs on long-term sobriety?”) and receive relevant results, even if the papers do not contain those exact keywords.6 The AI analyzes the relationships between words and concepts to identify conceptually similar documents, enabling a more intuitive and powerful discovery process.

Strengths for the Doctoral Researcher

AI-Generated Summaries (TLDRs): For tens of millions of papers, Semantic Scholar provides a “TLDR” (Too Long; Didn’t Read)—a single, AI-generated sentence that summarizes the paper’s main objective and findings. This feature, displayed directly on the search results page, allows for incredibly rapid screening of literature to determine relevance before committing to reading the full abstract or paper.24
Advanced Citation Analysis: It goes far beyond a simple citation count. The AI classifies the intent of a citation, indicating whether a paper was cited for its background information, its methodology, or its results. It also identifies “Highly Influential Citations,” which are citations that a machine-learning model has determined had a significant impact on the citing paper. These features help a researcher quickly understand a paper’s specific contribution and its place within the broader scholarly conversation.24
Enhanced Filtering and Discovery: It offers a more robust and well-organized set of filtering options than Google Scholar, allowing users to easily narrow results by Field of Study, Publication Type, Date Range, Author, or specific journals and conferences.16
Interactive Paper Pages: When viewing an individual paper, Semantic Scholar provides a wealth of AI-powered tools. These can include an “Ask This Paper” feature for asking direct questions about the article’s content, as well as automatically extracted figures, tables, and key topics, all designed to help the researcher grasp the paper’s core contributions at a glance.19
Non-Profit, Open-Access Mission: As a product of a non-profit institute, Semantic Scholar’s mission is to accelerate scientific progress by promoting equal access to knowledge. It provides its underlying academic graph data freely to the research community, fostering further innovation.20

Critical Limitations

Less Effective for Very Broad Queries: The precision of semantic search makes it exceptionally powerful for specific, well-defined research questions. However, for initial, very broad exploratory searches (e.g., “organizational leadership”), the sheer scale and keyword-based approach of Google Scholar may yield a wider, more comprehensive starting point.6
Potential for AI Errors: The AI-generated features, while revolutionary, are not perfect. TLDRs and other summaries can sometimes contain subtle factual inaccuracies or be phrased awkwardly. These features are best used as a first-pass screening tool, not as a substitute for reading the original work.24 The TLDR feature is also most developed for papers in the computer science and biomedical domains.24
Corpus Gaps: While its corpus is vast, it is not identical to Google Scholar’s. Some studies have shown that for certain niche topics, Google Scholar may retrieve a larger number of results, highlighting the importance of using multiple search tools in a comprehensive literature search.16

The Agentic Explorer: Google Deep Research (The AI Research Assistant)

Google Deep Research is not a search engine in the traditional sense. It is a distinct, agentic AI feature available within the paid Gemini Advanced subscription. It does not search a static, pre-existing index of documents; instead, it functions as a personal research assistant that actively explores the live web to investigate and synthesize information on a complex topic.27

Corpus and Scope

The “corpus” for Deep Research is, in effect, the entire accessible internet. When given a prompt, it can autonomously browse hundreds of websites to gather information.27 This includes academic publisher sites, university repositories, news organizations, government websites, non-profit and corporate pages, blogs, and more. This ability to traverse and integrate information from diverse source types is its defining characteristic.29

Search Mechanism

Deep Research operates through a multi-stage agentic process. Upon receiving a complex prompt, its first action is to formulate a multi-step research plan, breaking the large query down into smaller, manageable sub-tasks. This plan is presented to the user, who has the opportunity to approve it or edit it using natural language instructions. Once approved, the AI agent begins executing the plan. It autonomously performs web searches, browses websites, reads and analyzes the content it finds, and reasons over the gathered information in an iterative loop. Finally, it synthesizes all its findings into a comprehensive, multi-page narrative report, complete with citations for the sources it used.27

Strengths for the Doctoral Researcher

Deep Synthesis Across Diverse Source Types: The greatest strength of Deep Research is its capacity to move beyond the confines of academic databases and synthesize information from a wide variety of sources. For an action researcher in a Christian social services context, this is invaluable. It can integrate peer-reviewed theories on leadership with practical program reports from a church federation, case studies from a non-profit blog, and statistical data from a government agency, creating a holistic overview that would be incredibly time-consuming to assemble manually.30
Answering Complex, Nuanced Questions: It is purpose-built for tackling research questions that require extensive browsing and the manual piecing together of information from dozens of sources. It excels at helping a researcher go from “zero to deeply understanding a subject” in a short amount of time.30
Identifying Trends, Gaps, and Practical Applications: It can be prompted specifically to analyze industry trends, conduct a competitive analysis of similar organizations, or identify key themes, debates, and gaps across a body of literature. This is particularly useful for the action researcher needing to ground their project in both theoretical and practical realities.27
Transparency and User Control: The process is not a complete “black box.” While the tool is working, the user can click to “Show thinking” or view the “Sites browsed,” offering a degree of transparency into its research path and enabling the discovery of new and unexpected sources. The ability to edit the initial research plan gives the user significant control over the direction of the inquiry.30

Critical Limitations

Highest Risk of Hallucination and Fabrication: Because Deep Research generates original narrative prose and synthesizes complex information from many sources, the risk of error is significantly higher than with a standard search engine. It can misattribute findings, take information out of context, or, most dangerously, fabricate citations and sources entirely. Every single claim and citation in a Deep Research report must be rigorously verified against the original source. Relying on its output without this verification step is a grave academic risk.3
Not a Comprehensive or Systematic Search Tool: Deep Research is designed to produce a synthesized report, not an exhaustive bibliography. It will not find every relevant paper on a topic in the way a systematic search of library databases is designed to. It should be viewed as a powerful tool for exploration and initial synthesis, not as a replacement for systematic review methodologies.
Requires a Paid Subscription: Unlike Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar, access to the Deep Research feature is not free. It is part of the Gemini Advanced subscription, which carries a monthly cost.32
Quality is Highly Prompt-Dependent: The utility and accuracy of the final report are directly proportional to the quality of the initial prompt. Vague or poorly constructed prompts will lead to superficial or off-topic reports. Mastering the art of prompt engineering is essential for leveraging this tool effectively at a doctoral level.29

Table 1. At-a-Glance Comparison of Research Tools

To make strategic decisions about which tool to use for a specific task, the following table provides a summary comparison of their key attributes. This allows a researcher to quickly match the tool to the research need at hand.

Feature	Google Scholar	Semantic Scholar	Google Deep Research
Primary Function	Keyword-based Index	AI-powered Navigator	AI Research Assistant
Corpus Size	Largest (200M+ records)	Very Large (200M+ records)	The Live Web (dynamically browsed)
Source Types	Broadly “scholarly” (articles, books, theses, grey lit)	Primarily academic papers and preprints	All web content (academic, news, reports, etc.)
Key Strength	Finding seminal, highly-cited works via citation counts	Understanding papers and their connections via AI analysis	Synthesizing complex, multi-faceted topics from diverse sources
Best For…	Initial broad searches; finding foundational literature.	Deep-diving on specific papers; rapid screening; understanding scholarly conversations.	Exploratory research on complex practical problems; identifying trends and gaps across source types.
Biggest Risk	Information overload; difficulty filtering; relevance bias toward older work.	AI inaccuracies in summaries (TLDRs); not as comprehensive for all niche topics.	High potential for fabricated information and “hallucinated” citations that must be verified.
Cost	Free	Free	Paid Subscription (Gemini Advanced)

Part 2: The Researcher’s Role in the Age of AI: Human-Led vs. AI-Assisted Reviews

Understanding the tools is only the first step. The more profound challenge for a doctoral student is to develop a sophisticated and ethical framework for integrating these tools into their scholarly practice. This requires a clear understanding of what AI can and cannot do, and a firm grasp of the irreplaceable role of the human researcher. This section explores the comparison between traditional human-led reviews and the new model of AI-assisted reviews, establishing principles for effective and responsible use.

The Enduring Value of the Human Researcher: Beyond Information Retrieval

It is crucial to remember that the goal of a doctoral literature review is not merely to create a descriptive summary of existing work. It is a rigorous intellectual exercise in critical analysis, synthesis, and argumentation.34 The process itself—selecting, reading, critiquing, and connecting disparate sources—is what develops a student’s expertise, helps them situate their own research, identify a meaningful gap in the existing knowledge, and ultimately justify their study’s unique contribution to the field.35 This process is foundational to the development of a scholarly identity and cannot be short-circuited.

While AI can assist with information retrieval, several core intellectual functions remain the exclusive domain of the human researcher:

Critical Analysis and Nuanced Interpretation: AI models can summarize the explicit content of a paper, but they struggle to perform deep critical analysis. A human expert reads between the lines, identifying unstated assumptions, evaluating the strength of the methodology, understanding the subtle theoretical debates informing the work, and placing the findings in a broader intellectual context. AI, at present, provides breadth of knowledge but lacks the depth of contextual understanding that a human researcher brings.1
Synthesis and Original Argument: The culmination of a literature review is not a collection of summaries, but a new, coherent synthesis—an original argument about the state of the field that sets the stage for the student’s own research. AI can rehash and recombine existing information in novel ways, but it cannot yet generate a truly original, insightful, and imaginative argument that represents a genuine contribution to knowledge. This act of intellectual creation remains fundamentally human.36
Ethical and Theological Judgment: For students at City Vision University, this point is paramount. A core component of your scholarship involves evaluating research through the specific lens of Christian ethics, practical theology, and a commitment to social justice. This requires a values-based framework, wisdom, and discernment that AI does not possess. An AI cannot ask, “Is this leadership model consistent with a servant-hearted ethic?” or “Does this efficiency-focused solution honor the Imago Dei in the clients being served?” This critical, theological reflection is a uniquely human capability and a non-negotiable part of your scholarly and practical work.37

The Power and Peril of the AI-Assisted Review

To navigate the use of AI ethically, it is helpful to adopt a framework that distinguishes between legitimate assistance and illegitimate shortcuts. This can be conceptualized as the difference between “Cognitive Offloading” and “Cognitive Outsourcing.”

Cognitive Offloading (Strategic Use): This involves using AI to handle tasks that are time-consuming, repetitive, and require low levels of critical judgment. Examples include generating a list of potential papers, formatting a bibliography, checking for grammatical errors, or creating a first-pass summary of an article to quickly assess its relevance. In this model, the AI acts as a research assistant, offloading the “grunt work” and freeing up the human researcher’s finite cognitive resources for higher-order tasks like critical analysis, synthesis, and writing. This is a powerful and legitimate way to enhance efficiency.39
Cognitive Outsourcing (Unethical Use): This involves attempting to delegate the core intellectual work of the dissertation to the AI. Examples include prompting an AI to “write my literature review chapter” and using the output with minimal changes, or relying on an AI’s synthesis without verifying the sources or performing one’s own critical analysis. This is not only a serious breach of academic integrity but also fundamentally undermines the purpose of doctoral education, which is to develop the student’s own capacity for expert-level thinking and research.

With this framework in mind, one can better evaluate the pros and cons of an AI-assisted approach.

The Power (The Pros)

Unprecedented Speed and Efficiency: The most cited benefit of AI in research is the dramatic acceleration of the literature review process. AI tools can search, screen, and create initial summaries of vast amounts of literature in a fraction of the time it would take a human. A rapid evidence review that might have taken weeks or months can now be accomplished much more quickly, allowing researchers to keep pace with the rapid growth of publications.39
Breadth of Discovery and Connection: In an age of information overload, it is nearly impossible for a human to read everything. AI tools can process thousands of documents, identifying connections between papers, authors, and concepts that a researcher might miss through traditional search methods. This can help uncover novel lines of inquiry and ensure a more comprehensive review of the field.34
Idea Generation and Overcoming Writer’s Block: AI can serve as an effective “sparring partner” in the early stages of writing. It can help brainstorm research questions, generate potential outlines for a chapter, or produce a rough first draft of a section, providing a starting point that can help overcome the inertia of a blank page.36

The Peril (The Cons and Critical Risks)

The Crisis of Hallucinated References: This is the single most significant danger of using generative AI for literature reviews. These models are prediction engines optimized to produce convincing text, not to report facts accurately. As a result, they will frequently and confidently invent sources—creating plausible-looking citations for authors, articles, and journals that do not exist.3 Building any part of a scholarly argument on such a foundation is academically indefensible.
Factual Inaccuracies and Misattributions: Beyond complete fabrication, AI is prone to more subtle errors. It can misrepresent the findings of a real paper, take a quotation or data point out of its original context, or correctly state a finding but attribute it to the wrong author or publication. These errors are particularly insidious because they can appear credible at first glance.3
Algorithmic Bias and the “Echo Chamber” Effect: AI models are trained on the vast corpus of existing text on the internet, and they inherit the biases present in that data. In an academic context, this can lead to an over-representation of mainstream, highly-cited viewpoints, while marginalizing newer, critical, or alternative perspectives. This “rich get richer” phenomenon can stifle intellectual diversity and create an echo chamber that reinforces the status quo.2
Lack of Transparency (The “Black Box”): The complex neural networks that power large language models are often opaque, meaning that even their creators cannot fully explain why a specific prompt produced a specific output. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to fully trust or audit the AI’s “reasoning” process, reinforcing the need for external verification.45

The Non-Negotiable Verification Workflow

Given the high risks of hallucination and inaccuracy, a simple warning to “check your sources” is insufficient. Doctoral students must adopt a formal, systematic, and non-negotiable workflow for verifying every single piece of information generated by an AI tool like Google Deep Research. This process is not optional; it is a core requirement for the ethical use of AI in scholarship.

It’s worth stating that the level of rigor in verifying Google Deep Research should be proportional to the level of risk in how it might be used. For example, a rapid scoping report that is only used by yourself to identify which additional domains to research may need little verification; on the other extreme is that any research or source that is used in submitted work or your doctoral dissertation should be more carefully reviewed.

The following seven-step workflow provides a reliable method for ensuring the integrity of your sources:

Isolate the Citation: For every reference provided in an AI-generated report, copy the complete citation details: author(s), year, title of the work, and the journal or publisher source.
Primary Verification: Paste the title of the article or book into your university library’s primary search portal (e.g., OneSearch) and also into Google Scholar. This is the first step to confirm if the source actually exists in the scholarly ecosystem.31
Confirm All Details: If a matching title is found, meticulously compare every element of the citation. Does the author’s name match exactly? Does the year of publication match? Does the journal title or publisher match? AI models are known to combine a real author’s name with a completely fabricated article title, or place a real article in a non-existent journal.31 If any element does not match perfectly,
discard the reference immediately. It is a hallucination or a critical error.
Access the Full Text: Once you have verified that the citation points to a real, correctly identified publication, use your library’s resources to access the full-text PDF of the article or book chapter.
Verify the Specific Claim: Return to the AI-generated report and identify the specific claim, statistic, or summary statement that the source was cited to support. Open the full-text PDF and use the “Find” function (Ctrl+F or Cmd+F) to search for keywords related to that claim.
Read the Information in Its Original Context: Locate the relevant sentence, paragraph, or section in the original source. Read it carefully. Does it actually say what the AI claimed it says? Is the nuance preserved, or has the information been oversimplified or taken out of context? Is the AI’s interpretation of the finding accurate?
Cite the Original Source: Only after you have personally completed steps 1-6—confirming the source’s existence, accessing it, and verifying the specific claim in its original context—should you consider using that information in your own writing. When you do, you will cite the original paper that you have read, not the AI tool that helped you find it.

Strategic Integration: Aligning AI with Your Action Research Journey

The value of AI is not uniform across all stages of the research process. For a practitioner-scholar using an action research methodology, the key is to strategically align the capabilities of AI with the specific needs of each phase of the research cycle. Action research is often described as a cyclical process of diagnosing a problem, planning an intervention, acting on that plan, and evaluating the results, leading to a new cycle of reflection and action.35

Mapping AI’s strengths and weaknesses onto this cycle provides a sophisticated, context-aware model for its application:

Most Helpful Stages (High Potential for Strategic Use)

Problem Identification & Initial Exploration (Diagnose): This is where a tool like Google Deep Research can be exceptionally valuable. At the outset of a project, you can use it to quickly get up to speed on a complex practical problem (e.g., “causes of staff burnout in urban ministries”). Its ability to synthesize academic literature on burnout with practical reports from similar organizations, news articles, and government data provides a rich, multi-faceted initial understanding of the problem space.
Literature Review (Searching & Initial Synthesis): This is the most obvious application. Use Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar to conduct broad and deep searches to build a comprehensive bibliography. Use AI-powered features like TLDRs for rapid screening. You can then use Google Deep Research to generate an initial thematic summary of a subset of this literature, which can help you see potential patterns and structures for your own review. This AI-generated synthesis must then be subjected to the full verification workflow and be critically rewritten in your own scholarly voice.34
Methodology Identification (Plan): You can use AI prompts to explore how other researchers have studied similar problems. A prompt like, “What are the most common action research designs and data collection methods used in studies on implementing new leadership models in non-profits?” can quickly provide examples of surveys, interview protocols, or observational frameworks that you can then adapt for your own context.35

Moderately Helpful Stages (Use with Significant Caution and Oversight)

Data Analysis (Qualitative – Evaluate): For action research projects that involve collecting qualitative data like interviews or focus group transcripts, AI tools can be used for “cognitive offloading.” AI-driven transcription services (e.g., Otter.ai) can save hundreds of hours of manual work. However, you must be extremely cautious about data privacy and adhere strictly to your university’s policies regarding the use of third-party tools with sensitive research data.47 AI can also perform a preliminary thematic analysis, identifying frequently occurring words or concepts. However, the deep, nuanced interpretation of what that data
means in its specific human and ministry context must be entirely human-led.48
Drafting and Writing (Act/Evaluate): AI can be a useful writing assistant. It can help rephrase awkward sentences, check for grammar and style, or offer alternative ways to structure a paragraph. It is a tool for polishing and refining, not for generating the core substance of your analysis and argument.34

Least Helpful / High-Risk Stages (Avoid AI Reliance)

Ethical Decision-Making (All Stages): Navigating the complex ethical considerations of research involving human participants—especially in a vulnerable population served by a ministry—requires human wisdom, empathy, and strict adherence to Institutional Review Board (IRB) standards. AI has no capacity for ethical reasoning and should play no role in these decisions.
Final Interpretation and Synthesis (Evaluate): The ultimate “so what?” of your research project—the deep, context-rich interpretation of your findings and the reflective practice that leads to the next cycle of action—is the pinnacle of your scholarly contribution. This is where your unique insight as a scholar-practitioner comes to the fore. This task is fundamentally human and must be driven by your own intellect, experience, and wisdom.

Part 3: A Practical Guide to Conducting a Literature Review with Google Deep Research

This section provides actionable, step-by-step instructions for using the Google Deep Research feature within Gemini. It moves from the theoretical understanding of the tool to its practical application, offering a framework and specific examples tailored to the needs of a doctoral student in organizational leadership and innovation.

Getting Started with Deep Research

The process of initiating a query with Deep Research is straightforward, but each step offers a critical opportunity for the researcher to guide the AI’s output.

Access and Activation: First, ensure you are logged into a Google account that has an active Gemini Advanced subscription. Navigate to the Gemini interface at gemini.google.com. In the top-left corner of the screen, you will see a drop-down menu that likely defaults to “2.5 Pro or 3 Pro” Click on this menu and select “3 Pro with Deep Research” to activate the feature.28 The interface will now be configured to handle complex research tasks.
Initiating a Query: In the main chat box, type your carefully constructed research prompt. As will be detailed below, the quality of this initial prompt is the single most important factor in determining the quality of the final report. Once you have entered your prompt, press enter or click the submit button.
Reviewing and Editing the Research Plan: This is a crucial step that distinguishes Deep Research from other generative AI tools. Before it begins its extensive web search, Gemini will process your prompt and generate a “Research plan.” This plan outlines the key sub-topics and questions it intends to investigate to answer your query. Do not simply click “approve.” Review this plan carefully. Does it accurately capture the scope of your interest? Is it missing a key area? Is it planning to explore an irrelevant tangent? Use the “Edit plan” button to refine the scope. You can add, remove, or modify points using simple, natural language instructions (e.g., “Add a section on the financial challenges for small non-profits” or “Focus more on servant leadership and less on transformational leadership”).30 This step allows you to take control of the research process from the very beginning.

The Art of the Prompt: A Framework for Effective Inquiry

A vague prompt will yield a vague and often useless report. To leverage Deep Research at a doctoral level, you must learn to write precise, context-rich prompts. Thinking of a prompt as having a clear “anatomy” can demystify this process and transform it from guesswork into a repeatable skill. A well-structured prompt provides the AI with the necessary guardrails to produce a focused, relevant, and high-quality response.

Anatomy of a Doctoral-Level Research Prompt

An effective prompt for academic research generally contains several key components. While not all are necessary for every query, combining them will consistently produce better results.33

Persona: Begin by telling Gemini what role to adopt. Assigning a persona primes the model to access the appropriate knowledge domains and adopt the correct tone and level of detail. This is a powerful way to shape the output.51
- Example: “Act as an academic researcher specializing in organizational leadership and practical theology.”

Task: State the primary goal of your query as clearly and specifically as possible. Use action verbs that define the cognitive task you want the AI to perform.53
- Example: “Generate a comprehensive literature review that identifies…” or “Analyze the key research gaps in the literature concerning…”

Context: This is where you provide the essential background information that the AI needs to understand your request fully. The more relevant context you provide, the better the output will be.33
- Example: Define your core topic (“…the implementation of trauma-informed care models…”), your specific setting (“…within Christian social service organizations…”), and any key terms that might be ambiguous.

Format: Explicitly define the desired structure of the output. Without formatting instructions, the AI will default to a standard essay format. Specifying the structure gives you a report that is already organized for your needs.33
- Example: “Structure the report with an executive summary, thematic sections with clear headings, and a concluding section on practical implications. For each factual claim, provide an inline citation.”

Constraints and Source Preferences: Define the boundaries of the search. This is critical for academic work. Specify date ranges, geographic locations, and, most importantly, the types of sources you want the AI to prioritize or avoid. This helps filter out lower-quality or irrelevant information.54
- Example: “Prioritize sources from peer-reviewed academic journals published between 2015 and the present. Also include reports from major non-profit foundations. Avoid opinion pieces and personal blogs.”

Sample Prompts for Action Research in a Christian Social Services Context

The following sample prompts are designed to illustrate how the “Anatomy of a Prompt” framework can be applied to the specific research needs of City Vision doctoral students. They progress from a broad exploratory query to a highly specific request for identifying research gaps.

a. Prompt with No Specified Source Limitations (Broad Exploration)

This type of prompt is ideal for the very beginning of the research process, when the goal is to gain a broad, multi-faceted understanding of a practical problem.

Act as a research expert in organizational leadership and non-profit management. My research focuses on improving volunteer retention within faith-based homeless shelters.

Generate a comprehensive report on the key factors influencing volunteer motivation, satisfaction, and long-term commitment in Christian social service organizations.

The report should:
1. Identify major theories of volunteer motivation (e.g., Self-Determination Theory, Functional Approach).
2. Discuss practical challenges specific to faith-based contexts, such as the risk of spiritual burnout, managing diverse theological viewpoints among volunteers, and maintaining mission focus.
3. Include case studies or examples of successful volunteer retention strategies from non-profit, church-based, or parachurch programs.
4. Structure the output with clear headings for each thematic area, followed by a summary of key takeaways.

b. Prompt for Peer-Reviewed Sources

This prompt narrows the focus significantly, instructing the AI to function more like a traditional academic literature review tool by constraining its sources to the peer-reviewed literature. This is useful when the goal is to understand the established scholarly conversation on a topic.

Act as an academic researcher. I am conducting a literature review for my doctoral dissertation on the effectiveness of servant leadership training for ministry leaders in urban settings.

Generate a detailed literature review that synthesizes findings exclusively from peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2010 and the present.

The review must address the following questions:
1. How is ‘servant leadership’ operationally defined and measured in the academic literature?
2. What are the documented impacts of servant leadership on outcomes like employee engagement, team performance, and organizational health, specifically within non-profit and religious organizations?
3. What are the primary criticisms or limitations of the servant leadership model as discussed in scholarly articles?

Prioritize sources from journals in the fields of leadership studies, organizational psychology, non-profit management, and practical theology. Format the final output with a ‘References’ section in APA 7th Edition style.

c. Prompt for Sources with a DOI Number

This prompt uses a technical constraint—the presence of a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)—as a proxy for filtering for formally published academic content. Most modern journal articles, book chapters, and formal reports are assigned a DOI for persistent identification. Requesting sources with a DOI is a clever way to increase the scholarly quality of the results.

Act as a library research assistant. I need to identify academic sources for my action research project on implementing trauma-informed care models in a Christian counseling center.

Please find and summarize academic literature on this topic. For every source you use to construct your report, you must provide the full citation and its Digital Object Identifier (DOI).

The report should focus on:
1. The core principles of trauma-informed care and their theological underpinnings, if any.
2. Identified challenges and best practices for implementing these principles in faith-based counseling or social service settings.
3. Studies that measure the outcomes of trauma-informed care on both client well-being and staff burnout.

Only include information from sources for which a DOI is available. Structure the report thematically and provide a full list of the DOI-linked sources at the end.

d. Prompt for Identifying Research Gaps (Advanced)

This advanced prompt moves beyond summarizing what is known and asks the AI to perform a higher-level analytical task: identifying what is not known. This is a critical step in justifying a dissertation’s contribution to the field.

Act as a PhD-level academic research analyst. My dissertation topic is the role of innovative technology adoption (e.g., client relationship management software, mobile communication apps) in enhancing the operational efficiency and relational ministry of small to medium-sized Christian non-profits.

Conduct a deep analysis of the existing literature (including both academic papers and industry reports from sources like TechSoup or NTEN) and generate a report that explicitly identifies the key research gaps.

The report must be structured as follows:
1. **Section 1: What We Know.** A concise summary of the established benefits and challenges of technology adoption in the general non-profit sector.
2. **Section 2: What We Don’t Know (Thematic Research Gaps).** A detailed section outlining specific, unanswered questions relevant to the faith-based context. Frame these as potential research questions. For example: “To what extent does the theological orientation of a non-profit’s leadership (e.g., covenantal vs. contractual) influence the adoption rate of data-driven decision-making tools?” or “What is the long-term impact of client management software on the perceived quality of relational ministry by both staff and clients?”
3. **Section 3: Methodological Gaps.** Analyze the research methods that are most commonly used to study this topic and identify which methods or approaches are under-utilized. For instance, “While survey-based research is common, there is a lack of qualitative, ethnographic studies exploring the lived experience of ministry staff during a major technology transition.”

Part 4: Managing Your Sources: Citations, Bibliographies, and Zotero Integration

Finding and verifying sources is only half the battle. A core skill for any doctoral student is the meticulous management of those sources. This final section provides the critical technical instructions for generating properly formatted reference lists using Gemini and, more importantly, integrating those sources into a robust reference manager like Zotero.

Generating Reference Lists in Gemini

After Deep Research generates a report, you can ask it to format the sources it used into a standard bibliographic style. However, this step must always be preceded by the Non-Negotiable Verification Workflow detailed in Part 2.3. A perfectly formatted but fabricated citation is still a fabricated citation. Only after you have personally verified that every source is real and accurately represented should you proceed with formatting.

a. Prompts for APA 7th Edition Format

To ensure the highest accuracy, it is best to be explicit in your request. Simply asking for “APA style” may result in an outdated or incorrect format.

Sample Prompt for APA 7th Edition:

At the end of your prompt add:

Include a Works Cited at the end in APA v7 format including a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) where available.

b. Prompts for BibTeX Format

BibTeX is a file format used for managing references in conjunction with the LaTeX document preparation system, but its structured format is also the most reliable way to transfer bibliographic data between different systems, including into Zotero.

Sample Prompt for BibTeX:

The following could be added to the above APA prompt.

After that section, include a Sources in BibTex Format section including all sources with a DOI in BibTex Format.

Or you can provide more detail:

Following the report, please provide a complete list of all sources used. Format this entire list as a single block of BibTeX code. Do not include any explanatory text, only the code itself.

For each entry, ensure it includes fields such as author, title, journal, volume, number, pages, year, and DOI where available, such as in the example below:

 

@article{key,
 author    = {Author, First A. and Author, Second B.},
 title     = {The Complete Title of the Work},
 journal   = {The Full Name of the Journal},
 year      = {2023},
 volume    = {10},
 number    = {2},
 pages     = {100--110},
 doi       = {10.xxxx/journal.xxxx}
}

4.2 Step-by-Step Workflow for Zotero Integration

Zotero is a free, open-source reference management software that is essential for organizing the hundreds of sources required for a doctoral dissertation. It allows you to collect, organize, cite within your word processor, and share research sources. Mastering Zotero is a critical time-saving skill. The following workflows detail how to move sources from your research environment into your Zotero library.

The Google Scholar to Zotero Workflow (Batch Export)

This method is ideal for exporting a collection of articles that you have saved in your Google Scholar library.

Save to Library: In Google Scholar, as you conduct your searches, click the “Star” icon located beneath any result you find relevant. This saves the item to your personal “My Library”.55
Access Library: Once you have saved several items, click the “My Library” link in the top right corner of the Google Scholar page.
Select for Export: In your library view, use the checkboxes to select all the articles you wish to export to Zotero. You can select all items on the page by clicking the top checkbox.55
Export as BibTeX: Click the “Export” button (an arrow icon) at the top of the list. From the small drop-down menu that appears, select “BibTeX”.56
Save the File: Your browser will either automatically download a file with a .bib extension or open a new tab displaying the raw BibTeX code. If a new tab opens, right-click on the page, select “Save As…”, and save the file to your computer. Give it a memorable name, like volunteer_retention_sources.bib.
Import into Zotero: Open your Zotero desktop application. Navigate to the File menu and select Import….
Choose File: In the import wizard, ensure the option “A file (BibTeX, RIS, Zotero RDF, etc.)” is selected and click “Next.”
Locate and Open: Navigate to the location where you saved your .bib file, select it, and click “Open.” Zotero will process the file and import all the selected references, placing them into a new collection named after the file.

The Gemini BibTeX to Zotero Workflow (Clipboard Import)

This is the most efficient method for moving a verified list of sources from a Google Deep Research report directly into Zotero.

Generate BibTeX in Gemini: After you have completed your verification workflow for the sources in a Deep Research report, use the prompt from section 4.1b to instruct Gemini to generate a clean, complete list of sources in BibTeX format.
Copy to Clipboard: Carefully select the entire block of BibTeX code generated by Gemini. Make sure you capture everything from the first @article to the final closing brace }. Copy this text to your computer’s clipboard (Ctrl+C on Windows/Linux, Cmd+C on Mac).
Import from Clipboard in Zotero: Open your Zotero desktop application. Navigate to the File menu and select Import from Clipboard.57
Automatic Import: Zotero will automatically detect and parse the BibTeX code on your clipboard and import the items directly into your library. This is a very fast and effective method. For even greater efficiency, you can use the keyboard shortcut: Ctrl+Alt+Shift+I on Windows/Linux or Cmd+Option+Shift+I on Mac.57

The Zotero Connector for Books (e.g., on Amazon.com)

Doctoral research relies heavily on books as well as articles. The Zotero Connector browser extension is the easiest way to capture bibliographic data for books from library catalogs or online booksellers.

Prerequisites: Ensure you have the Zotero desktop application open and running on your computer. You must also have the Zotero Connector extension installed in your web browser (e.g., Chrome, Firefox, Safari).58
Navigate to the Book Page: In your browser, go to the specific product page for a book on a site like Amazon.com, Google Books, or your university’s library catalog.59
Locate the Connector Icon: Look at the Zotero Connector icon in your browser’s toolbar. When it recognizes a book on the page, the icon will change from a generic page icon to a blue “book” icon.59
Click to Save: Simply click the book icon. A small pop-up notification will appear in the corner of your screen, confirming that the item is being saved to your Zotero library.
Assign to Collection (Optional): You can click on this pop-up notification as it appears to select a specific collection (folder) within Zotero where you would like to store the reference.
Verify Data: The full bibliographic data for the book—including author, title, publisher, publication date, and ISBN—will be automatically added to your Zotero library. As with all automated imports, it is good practice to quickly review the imported record in Zotero to ensure all fields are correct and complete.

This report was generated by Google Gemini 2.5 Deep Research using the prompt:
“You are assisting in writing a guide to provide students with instructions on how to use Google Deep research for literature reviews in a professional doctoral program. The guide should

1. Explain the differences and pros/cons in the types of literature that might be covered by a) scholar.google.com b) semantic scholar c) a google Deep research review.

2. Explain the pros and cons of a human led literature review compared to an AI-led literature review using Google Deep Research. Compare the reliability and quality of the references provided by Google Deep Research to other more reliable sources. Identify at which stages of a doctoral research process that Google Deep Research might be most helpful.

3. Instructions for how to use Google Deep research to conduct a literature review. Include sample prompts to use. In particular, provide prompts with a. no specified limitation on types of sources b. Peer reviewed sources c. Sources with a DOI number d. Others

4. Instructions for 1) prompts to get gemini to add reference sections at the end in APA v7 format 2) prompts to get gemini to add reference sections at the end in Sources in BibTeX 3) How to import the BibTeX reference section at the end into Zotero

1. The cite feature in Google scholar using Bibtex and then using the Import from Clipboard feature in Zotero

2. The zotero browser extension on Amazon.com pages for books

The audience is students in City Vision University’s Doctorate in Organizational Leadership and Innovation. These students are using the action research methodology and are primarily researching how to solve practical problems in a Christian social services context.”
It was reviewed by Dr. Andrew Sears for accuracy.

Works cited

Evaluating Literature Reviews Conducted by Humans … – JMIR AI, accessed July 13, 2025, https://ai.jmir.org/2024/1/e56537
Will AI revolutionize literature reviews? – PMC, accessed July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586817/
The Credibility Crisis: AI-Generated Citations in Expert Testimony – VMG Health, accessed July 13, 2025, https://vmghealth.com/insights/published-article/the-credibility-crisis-ai-generated-citations-in-expert-testimony/
Accuracy of Sources – Artificial Intelligence and Information Literacy – Research Guides, accessed July 13, 2025, https://guides.lib.wayne.edu/c.php?g=1470324&p=10943252
Citing & Evaluating AI-Generated Text – Citation Style Guide …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://guides.nyu.edu/citations/citing-AI-generated-text
Google Scholar vs. AI Academic Search : Expanding the literature …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://library.smu.edu.sg/topics-insights/google-scholar-vs-ai-academic-search-expanding-literature-review-toolkit
Google Scholar vs. ResearchGate vs. Semantic Scholar Comparison – SourceForge, accessed July 13, 2025, https://sourceforge.net/software/compare/Google-Scholar-vs-ResearchGate-vs-Semantic-Scholar/
A Guide to Google Scholar – LibGuides at Marymount Manhattan College, accessed July 13, 2025, https://mmm-library.libguides.com/c.php?g=1463983
Search Literature Effectively for Business Research : Google Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://libguides.hkust.edu.hk/sbm-pdev/google-scholar
Google Scholar Help Guide: Search Tips – Library Guides – University of Washington, accessed July 13, 2025, https://guides.lib.uw.edu/hsl/google-scholar
Google Scholar and grey literature – Pharmacy Literature Search Skills – Research Guides at University of British Columbia, accessed July 13, 2025, https://guides.library.ubc.ca/pharmacysearchskills/gs
Google Scholar Basics – Subject Guides at University of North Texas …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://libguides.unthsc.edu/google-basics
Pros/Cons – Google Scholar – LibGuides at ATU Library, accessed July 13, 2025, https://atlantictu.libguides.com/googlescholar/pros
Google Scholar Search Help, accessed July 13, 2025, https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html
How do I set up Google Scholar to send citations to RefWorks or Zotero? | University of Toronto Libraries, accessed July 13, 2025, https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/faq/how-do-i-set-google-scholar-send-citations-refworks-or-zotero
Google Scholar versus Semantic Scholar: a comparative evaluation – Zenodo, accessed July 13, 2025, https://zenodo.org/record/6474016/files/GoogleScholarVsSemanticWeb.pdf
How to use Google Scholar – WUR, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.wur.nl/en/article/how-to-use-google-scholar.htm
Literature Search: Semantic Scholar – Commerce Research Library, accessed July 13, 2025, https://library.doc.gov/LitSearch/Semantic-Scholar
A Guide to AI Tools for Research: Semantic Scholar – McMaster LibGuides, accessed July 13, 2025, https://libguides.mcmaster.ca/ai-tools-for-research/semantic-scholar
About Us – Semantic Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/about
www.semanticscholar.org, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/product/tutorials#:~:text=Semantic%20Scholar’s%20corpus%20includes%20nearly,business%2C%20history%2C%20and%20economics.
Librarian Resources – Semantic Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/about/librarians
Semantic Scholar – Wikipedia, accessed July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Scholar
Frequently Asked Questions – Semantic Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/faq
TLDR Feature – Semantic Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/product/tldr
Tutorials – Semantic Scholar, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/product/tutorials
Gemini Deep Research — your personal research assistant – Google Gemini, accessed July 13, 2025, https://gemini.google/overview/deep-research/
Try Deep Research and our new experimental model in Gemini, your AI assistant, accessed July 13, 2025, https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-deep-research/
Mastering AI-Powered Research: My Guide to Deep Research, Prompt Engineering, and Multi-Step Workflows : r/ChatGPTPro – Reddit, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/comments/1in87ic/mastering_aipowered_research_my_guide_to_deep/
How to use Google’s Deep Research, an AI researching tool, accessed July 13, 2025, https://blog.google/products/gemini/tips-how-to-use-deep-research/
Evaluating AI Generated Content – Using AI Tools in Your Research, accessed July 13, 2025, https://libguides.northwestern.edu/ai-tools-research/evaluatingaigeneratedcontent
Hands on with Deep Research – Leon Furze, accessed July 13, 2025, https://leonfurze.com/2025/02/15/hands-on-with-deep-research/
How to Write a Deep Research Prompt for Gemini 1.5: Best …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://7minute.ai/deep-research-prompt-for-gemini/
Full article: Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in the literature review process – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049?af=R
Planning Your Research: Reviewing the Literature and Developing Questions – Action Research, accessed July 13, 2025, https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/gradactionresearch/chapter/chapt3/
AI vs Human Generated Content: Pros and Cons – ClickUp, accessed July 13, 2025, https://clickup.com/blog/ai-generated-content-vs-human-content/
Artificial Intelligence and Theology – Atla Open Press, accessed July 13, 2025, https://serials.atla.com/theolib/article/view/3512/4770
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THEOLOGY: LOOKING FOR A POSITIVE— – Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/14871/galley/30119/download/
AI-Assisted vs human-only evidence review: results from a … – GOV.UK, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-assisted-vs-human-only-evidence-review/ai-assisted-vs-human-only-evidence-review-results-from-a-comparative-study
AI-assisted vs human-only evidence review | BIT – Behavioural Insights Team, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.bi.team/publications/ai-assisted-vs-human-only-evidence-review/
Harnessing AI for Breakthroughs in PhD Research: Beyond the Ordinary, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.ssbr-edu.ch/harnessing-ai-for-breakthroughs-in-phd-research-beyond-the-ordinary/
The Challenge of Comprehensive Literature Reviews in Modern Research – AI Assistance? : r/labrats – Reddit, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/labrats/comments/1jqhslj/the_challenge_of_comprehensive_literature_reviews/
Effective and Responsible Use of AI in Research – UW Graduate School, accessed July 13, 2025, https://grad.uw.edu/advice/effective-and-responsible-use-of-ai-in-research/
Is Utilizing AI Tools for Conducting Literature Reviews in Academic Research Advisable?, accessed July 13, 2025, https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/205889/is-utilizing-ai-tools-for-conducting-literature-reviews-in-academic-research-adv
Ethics in AI – AI for Literature Reviews – Library Guides at Tulane University, accessed July 13, 2025, https://libguides.tulane.edu/c.php?g=1368318&p=10586780
Advantages and Challenges in Using AI (Artificial Intelligence) in Research: A Literature Review – ResearchGate, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383272858_Advantages_and_Challenges_in_Using_AI_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Research_A_Literature_Review
Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools in Research | Information Technology Services, accessed July 13, 2025, https://its.uiowa.edu/services/protecting-sensitive-data/using-artificial-intelligence-ai-tools-research
AI Action Research Process Tools For 2024 – Insight7 – AI Tool For …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://insight7.io/ai-action-research-process-tools-for-2024/
AI Steps in Action Research Platforms – Insight7 – AI Tool For Interview Analysis & Market Research, accessed July 13, 2025, https://insight7.io/ai-steps-in-action-research-platforms/
www.revolgy.com, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.revolgy.com/insights/blog/smarter-way-to-research-with-google-gemini-deep-research#:~:text=Getting%20started%20is%20simple.,plan%20to%20fit%20your%20needs.
5 tips for writing great prompts for Gemini in the Workspace side panel – Google Blog, accessed July 13, 2025, https://blog.google/products/workspace/google-gemini-workspace-ai-prompt-tips/
Deep research – how to get Gemini to output hyperlinks when citing sources in text?, accessed July 13, 2025, https://support.google.com/gemini/thread/351149877/deep-research-how-to-get-gemini-to-output-hyperlinks-when-citing-sources-in-text?hl=en
Tips to write prompts for Gemini – Google Workspace Learning Center, accessed July 13, 2025, https://support.google.com/a/users/answer/14200040?hl=en
ChatGPT Prompt of the Day: The Deep Research GPT : r/ChatGPTPromptGenius – Reddit, accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPromptGenius/comments/1jbyp7a/chatgpt_prompt_of_the_day_the_deep_research_gpt/
Export BibTex from Google Scholar | FacultySuccess@OregonState …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://digitalmeasures.oregonstate.edu/training/export-bibtex-google-scholar
Import your publications from Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu using BibTeX and Zotero, accessed July 13, 2025, https://help.oapolicy.universityofcalifornia.edu/support/solutions/articles/9000099151-import-your-publications-from-google-scholar-researchgate-academia-edu-using-bibtex-and-zotero
kb:import_from_clipboard [Zotero Documentation], accessed July 13, 2025, https://www.zotero.org/support/kb/import_from_clipboard
Zotero Connector – Chrome Web Store, accessed July 13, 2025, https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/zotero-connector/ekhagklcjbdpajgpjgmbionohlpdbjgc
Collecting Citations with Your Web Browser – Zotero – Research …, accessed July 13, 2025, https://uark.libguides.com/zotero/collectweb
Creating your library – Zotero – Library Guides – UC Santa Cruz, accessed July 13, 2025, https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/c.php?g=240807&p=9190253
Save Sources – Zotero for Citation Management – Guides at Middlebury College – LibGuides, accessed July 13, 2025, https://middlebury.libguides.com/zotero/save